HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 405/2025 SH. SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The petition is disposed of, along with pending application(s), if any
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to approach this Court again in case the directions are not complied with by the Respondents. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, JHARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, JMAY 22, 2025S. Zakir
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 405/2025 SH. SUNIL KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Janak Raj Ambavat, Mr. Vikram Singh, Ms. Deeksha Bansal, Ms. Reetika Nahata, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl) with Ms. Priyam Aggarwal, Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Madan Sagar & Ms. Rajni, Advs for Respondent No.2. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKARO R D E R% 22.05.20251.The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner in the nature of Habeas Corpus for a direction to the Respondents to trace and produce the wife of the Petitioner, who is stated to be missing since 10.07.2021. 2. In compliance of the last Order dated 29.04.2025, a detailed status report has been filed. A perusal of the status report reveals that despite best efforts, the Police has not been able to trace the wife of the Petitioner. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 01:05:55
Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents, states that an FIR has been registered and a Polygraph Test of the father, mother and brother of the wife of the Petitioner will be conducted after taking steps in accordance with law by moving an appropriate application before the concerned Magistrate and further the Polygraph Test Reports will be produced before the concerned Magistrate for further action. The statement is taken on record. Let the same be done in accordance with law.
Operative part
The petition is disposed of, along with pending application(s), if any.
Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to approach this Court again in case the directions are not complied with by the Respondents. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, JHARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, JMAY 22, 2025S. Zakir
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is disposed of, along with pending application(s), if any
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.