Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 125/2026, CAV 62/2026, CM APPL. 8371/2026, CM APPL. 8372/2026 & CM APPL. 8373/2026 SH. BALWANT SINGH AND ANR .....Appellants Through:
Mr. Vikrant Vashisth and Mr. sukrant Vashisith, Advocates
versus
SMT. JALPA DUGAL AND ANR .....Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 06.02.2026
Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 19.11.2025 whereby the Appellants have been held as a tenant in the Suit Property and the decree of possession and mesne profits has been filed against them.
After some submissions, learned Counsel for the Appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present Appeal with liberty to seek his remedy in accordance with the law.
Present Appeal alongwith pending Applications, is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J FEBRUARY 6, 2026 N
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.