✦ Delhi High Court

JITENDAR KUMAR SHARMA v. ANITA ANAND

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Application is disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as being devoid of any merits. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. FEBRUARY 25, 2026/nd/ik RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J Signature Not Verified Signed By:NAMITA DHYANI Signing Date:26.02.2026 11:30:49 CM(M) 233/2026

Judgment

Through: Mr. Lakshay Yadav, Mr. Gaurav Kumar and Mr. Abhishek Gusain, Advocates. versus ANITA ANAND .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER (Oral) Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.

1.

This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 6327/2026 (for exemption)

Operative part

2.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM(M) 233/2026 & CM APPL. 6326/2026 (for stay)

3.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 assailing the order dated 20th April, 2024, passed by the learned Trial Court in CS SCJ No. 1099/2020, whereby the leave to defend was granted to the petitioner/defendant, subject to deposit of 50% of the suit amount as security in the favour of the plaintiff.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a poor Signature Not Verified Signed By:NAMITA DHYANI Signing Date:26.02.2026 11:30:49 CM(M) 233/2026 person and is not in a position to deposit the said amount, as he has to look after his family and further due to the medical condition of his wife, a substantial portion of his earning is spent on her treatment.

6.

Heard. Record perused. Perusal of the impugned order shows that the learned Trial Court has passed the same after taking into consideration all the material available on the record. The plea regarding the financial condition of the petitioner, as raised before this Court, does not justify the prayer seeking modification of the impugned order with respect to the amount directed to be deposited as security before the learned Trial Court. This court, therefore, does not find any illegality of infirmity in the impugned order as it is a reasoned order passed in accordance with law, and the same is upheld.

7.

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as being devoid of any merits. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. FEBRUARY 25, 2026/nd/ik RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J Signature Not Verified Signed By:NAMITA DHYANI Signing Date:26.02.2026 11:30:49 CM(M) 233/2026

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Application is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments