✦ High Court of India · 19 Feb 2025

Mr. Amanjeet Singh, Advocate along with v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ANR

Case Details High Court of India · 19 Feb 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
19 Feb 2025
Length
1,146 words

Cited in this judgment

Through: Mr. Amanjeet Singh, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for the State with SI Anil, Police Station Seemapuri Mr. Sameer Rai, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH O R D E R 19.02.2025 The instant petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter “BNSS”) [(earlier Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter “Cr.P.C.”)] has been filed on behalf of the petitioners praying for quashing of FIR bearing No. 282/2021 dated – 22nd June, 2021 registered at Police Station – Seemapuri, Delhi for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter “IPC”) and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. 2. The Joint Registrar (Judicial) vide order dated 23rd January, 2025 has verified the facts and details of the instant matter. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 got solemnized on 6th February, 2019 at Delhi This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2025 at 12:36:19 according to Sikh/Hindu rites and ceremonies but due to some temperamental differences between them, they started living separately since 14th February, 2020 but now after the intervention of the family members, they are residing together peacefully. A child was born out of their wedlock on 8th December, 2019. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that with the intervention of family members and relatives, both the parties have amicably settled the matter vide Memorandum of Settlement dated 17th January, 2025. The terms and conditions of the said settlement deed are mentioned in the said settlement which is annexed as Annexure P-4 to the petition. 5. Therefore, it is prayed that the instant FIR may be quashed on the basis of above said settlement dated 17th January, 2025 and in accordance with the settled law on this point as posited by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 6. Learned APP for the State submitted that there is no objection to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of the FIR in question in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. 7. 8. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The petitioners are present before this Court through video conferencing and have been identified by their counsel, Mr. Amanjeet Singh and Investigating Officer SI Anil, Police Station - Seemapuri, Delhi. The respondent no. 2 is also present in the Court through video conferencing and has been identified by the Investigating Officer as well as by her counsel Mr. Sameer Rai. 9. On the query made by this Court, respondent no.2 has categorically stated that she has settled the matter on her own free will and without any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2025 at 12:36:19 pressure. It is also stated by respondent no.2 that the entire dispute has been amicably settled between the parties and she does not wish to pursue the aforesaid FIR any further as they are now residing together peacefully. The parties also undertook that they shall abide the terms and conditions of the aforesaid settlement arrived at between the parties. 10. The instant criminal proceedings in respect of non-compoundable offences are private in nature and do not have a serious impact on the society especially when there is a settlement/compromise between victim and accused. In such cases, it is settled law that High Court is also required to consider the conduct and antecedents of the accused in order to ascertain that the settlement has been entered into by her own free will and has not been imposed upon her by the petitioners or any person related to them. 11. In the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and Ors., (2019) 5 SCC 688, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the powers conferred under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C, can be exercised by the Courts to quash the criminal proceedings featuring non-compoundable offences, when the matter arises out of matrimonial or family disputes. Moreover, it is pertinent to satisfy the Court that the said non-compoundable offences are private in nature and does not have a serious impact on the society. 12. Furthermore, it was observed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramgopal and Ors. Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh, 2021 INSC 568, that the extraordinary power enjoined upon the High Courts under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. can be invoked even when such a case falls within the ambit of non-compoundable offences given that the Court must be satisfied that the nature of the offence does not impact the conscience of the society and that the compromise between the parties is voluntary and This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2025 at 12:36:19 amicable. 13. In the present case, the complainant/ respondent no.2 is present in Court and has categorically stated that she has entered into compromise and settled the entire disputes amicably with the petitioners by her own free will without any pressure or coercion. Further, there is no allegation from respondent no.2 that the conduct and antecedents of petitioners have been bad towards her after the compromise. Moreover, the petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 reconciled and are now living together peacefully. 14. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the fact that they are now living together, the present petition is allowed. Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 282/2021 dated – 22nd June, 2021 registered at Police Station – Seemapuri, Delhi for offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 15. The petition alongwith pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. FEBRUARY 19, 2025 Rk/anr/mk CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2025 at 12:36:19

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments