Kumar, Mr. Imran Khan & Mr. Jitto Joseph, Advocates versus ANURADHA KASHYAP v. Dr. Anuradha Kashyap”, pending before the Family Court-02, East District, Karkardooma Courts
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAVINDER DUDEJA
Outcome
Disposed of
Application stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. With these directions, petition stands disposed of. JANUARY 16, 2025 RM RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is…
Judgment
Cause title
Through:
Mr. Raj Kumar,
Mr. Imran Khan & Mr. Jitto Joseph, Advocates
versus
ANURADHA KASHYAP .....Respondent Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
Operative part
% 16.01.2025 CM APPL. 2656/2025 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM(M) 81/2025
This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for issuing directions for expeditious disposal of the divorce petition bearing HMA No. 182/2021, titled as “Dr. Sushil Kumar Vs. Dr. Anuradha Kashyap”, pending before the Family Court-02, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.
This Court vide order dated 17.07.2023 in CM (M) 1093/2023, had issued directions to the Family Court not to grant any unwarranted adjournments in the divorce petition and to make an endeavour to decide/dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:08:08
Learned counsel submits that despite such directions, respondent is deliberately trying to delay the disposal of the petition. It is submitted that the matter is still pending for evidence of the respondent and he is not completing his evidence, due to which, the matter is getting delayed.
Without knowing the board position of the trial court, it may not be appropriate to issue any time-bound directions. Petition is disposed of with fresh directions to the trial court to make best possible endeavour to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. The trial court shall ensure that no unnecessary adjournments are granted. The Advocates, appearing for the parties, are also directed to render their due co-operation to the trial court in expediting the matter.
With these directions, petition stands disposed of. JANUARY 16, 2025 RM RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:08:08
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Application stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.