Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANIL KSHETARPAL, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
Provisions considered
- Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 s. 24
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Learned counsel representing the parties have submitted that the Divorce Petition has been disposed on 30.07.2025 by the Family Court. Learned counsel are ad idem that no further order is required to be passed in the present Appeal as it is settled that an…
Judgment
Cause title
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 12/2023 and CM APPL. 1596/2023 ROHIT KUMAR .....Appellant Through:
Mr. Viraj Datar, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Anil sharma, Mr. Aman Bhardwaj and Mr. Arpit Sharma, Advs.
versus
ITI KUMAR .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Aman Chawla, Mr. Karan Dua and Mr. Srishti Agarwal, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
O R D E R
% 14.10.2025
Learned counsel representing the parties have submitted that the Divorce Petition has been disposed on 30.07.2025 by the Family Court. Learned counsel are ad idem that no further order is required to be passed in the present Appeal as it is settled that an order under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 would be effective only upto the date when the divorce petition is disposed of.
This Court has considered the submissions made by the learned counsel representing the parties.
The present Appeal, along with pending application, is accordingly disposed of. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. OCTOBER 14, 2025 s.godara/dev
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.