CIGMAEVENTSPRIVATELIMITED v. DEEPAKGUPTA.....RespondentsThrough & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI+FAO(OS)2/2025CIGMAEVENTSPRIVATELIMITED.....AppellantThrough: Mr.AnkitJain, SeniorAdvocatewithMs.AprajitaJha, Mr.AdityaChauhan, Ms.ApurvaTyagi, Mr.RishabhJain, Advocates.versusDEEPAKGUPTA&ORS......RespondentsThrough:CORAM:HON'BLEMS.JUSTICEREKHAPALLIHON'BLEMR.JUSTICEAJAYDIGPAULORDER%14.01.2025CMAPPL.1987/20251.Exemptionallowed, subjecttoalljustexceptions.
Theapplicationstandsdisposedof.FAO(OS)2/2025&CMAPPL.1986/2025(Stay)
ThepresentappealunderSection10oftheDelhiHighCourtAct,1966seekstoassailtheorderdated24.12.2024passedbythelearnedSingleJudgeinI.A.48682/2024inCS(OS)No.1011/2024,asuitpreferredbytheappellant/plaintiffseekingpermanentandmandatoryinjunction, recoveryanddamagesagainsttherespondents/defendants.
Aftersomearguments, learnedseniorcounselfortheappellantsubmitsthatsincetheimpugnedorderwaspassedevenbeforetherespondentsfiledtheirwrittenstatements, theappellant, insteadofpressingthepresentappeal, wouldbesatisfiedifitisgrantedlibertytofileafresh This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 14:58:44 applicationforinjunctionafterwrittenstatementsarefiledbytherespondentsintheongoingproceedingsbeforethelearnedSingleJudge.
Havingperusedtheimpugnedorder, weareinclinedtoagreewiththelearnedSeniorCounselthatsomeoftheobservationsmadeintheimpugnedorderwereuncalledfor. We,therefore, findmeritintheappellant’sprayerforlibertytofileafreshapplicationunderOrderXXXIXRule1and2oftheCodeofCivilProcedure,1908(‘CPC’)beforethelearnedSingleJudge.
Inthesecircumstances, whiledisposingoftheappealasnotpressed, wepermittheappellanttofileafreshapplicationunderOrderXXXIXRule1and2CPCafterthedefenceoftherespondentsisbroughtonrecordbeforethelearnedSingleJudge.
WethereforemakeitclearthattheobservationsmadeintheimpugnedorderwillnotcomeinthewayoftheappellantmovinganapplicationandthereforeincaseafreshapplicationunderOrderXXXIXRule1and2CPCismovedbytheappellant, thesamewillbeconsideredbythelearnedSingleJudgeonitsownmerits, withoutbeinginfluencedbythefindingsintheimpugnedorderdated24.12.2024.REKHAPALLI,JAJAYDIGPAUL,JJANUARY14,2025/uk
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.