VIJAY SHARMA v. VINOD SHARMA & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 39 r. 2A
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The statement made by learned counsel is taken on record and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. MARCH 10, 2025/ib/ia RAVINDER DUDEJA, J This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by…
Judgment
Through: Mr. Rahul Bakshi, Adv. (through VC) versus VINOD SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jaideep Malik, Adv. for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Lokesh Yadav, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA % 1. Mr. Rahul Bakshi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
O R D E R 10.03.2025 that the petition has become infructuous inasmuch as the trial court has already passed an order on the application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, and therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Operative part
The statement made by learned counsel is taken on record and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. MARCH 10, 2025/ib/ia RAVINDER DUDEJA, J This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2025 at 11:45:41
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 39 r. 2A.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.