✦ Delhi High Court

Judgment · High Court

VIKAS MAHAJAN

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2053/2008 RAHUL PURI & ANR Through: None. versus .....Plaintiffs MADHU NARANG & ANR Through: Ms. Angana (through VC) .....Defendants Sarmah, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

O R D E R 02.09.2024 % I.A. 5324/2023 (under Section 151 CPC to bring on record additional documents as per direction of Hon’ble Court by plaintiffs) I.A. 6248/2023 (under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 seeking amendment of prayer as per direction of Hon’ble Court by plaintiffs) I.A. 6249/2023 (under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 for condoning delay of 4 days in filing application under Order VI Rule 17 with Section 151 CPC seeking amendment of prayer) I.A. 4041/2024 (under Order I Rule 10 CPC seeking impleadment of proposed plaintiff in placed of original plaintiff by proposed plaintiff) I.A. 8241/2024 (under Order VII Rule 14 CPC on behalf of proposed plaintiff for submitting of documents as per orders dated 20.02.2024 and 07.03.2024 by proposed plaintiff)

1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant through video conferencing prays for time to make her submissions in these IAs.

2.

At request, renotify on 06.12.2024. SEPTEMBER 2, 2024/‘rs’ VIKAS MAHAJAN, J This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2024 at 12:24:17

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Delhi High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments