Shyamsundar Kaushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, this petition is disposed of,
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 99. Interlocutory application(s), pending if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Deepti Jha
Judgment
: Mr. Shikhar Agnihotri, counsel appears on behalf of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. Anway Tiwari, P.L. For Respondents No.5 & 6 : Mr. Ram Vifal Ram Rajwade, Advocate. 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/07/2026
Heard.
This petition has been preferred by petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of petitioners.
10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the writ petition and quash the order dated 24.03.2022 (Annexure-P/1), 27.09.2021 (Annexure-P/2) and 17.02.2022 (Annexure-P/3) in the interest of justice.
10.3 Any other relief, which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be allowed.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has filed this writ petition against the order dated 17.02.2022 (Annexure-P/3) passed by the Commissioner, Durg Division, Durg (C.G.), he may be permitted to approach before the State for seeking redressal of his grievances.
Learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents have not raised any objection.
I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the material available on record.
As the dispute is related to grant of ‘Patta’, which has been granted to the petitioner, however, the revenue authorities are holding that the ‘Patta’, which has been granted to the petitioner is not maintainable, therefore, the petitioner has to approach before the concerned authorities having alternative remedy under the law. 3
Operative part
Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, this petition is disposed of, directing petitioner to approach before the concerned authorities against the order dated 17.02.2022 (Annexure-P/3) passed by the Commissioner, Durg Division, Durg (C.G.) by which the Patta granted in favour of the petitioner has been held to be bad in law.
With aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.
Interlocutory application(s), pending if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Deepti Jha
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, this petition is disposed of,
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.