Durg, Chhattisgarh v. Shri Netram Sahu S/o S. K. Dewangan Aged About 70 Years R/o Qr. No
Case Details
1 2025:CGHC:2051 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2185 of 2018 Gaurav Dewangan S/o Shri S. K. Dewangan Aged About 34 Years R/o Qr. No. 3/13, Street No. 41, Sector- 7, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus Shri Netram Sahu S/o S. K. Dewangan Aged About 70 Years R/o Qr. No. 3/13, Street No. 41, Sector- 7, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) along with CRMP No. 2186 of 2018
Legal Reasoning
Gaurav Dewangan S/o Shri S. K. Dewangan Aged About 34 Years R/o Qr. No.3/13, Street No. 41, Sector- 7, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus Shri Manish Soni S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Soni R/o House No. 299, Jabbal Gali, Ward No.1, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) along with CRMP No. 2247 of 2018 RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN Date: 2025.01.14 12:12:31 +0530 Gaurav Dewangan S/o Shri S.K. Dewangan Aged About 34 Years R/o Qr. No. 3/13 ,street No. 41 Sector -7 Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus Shri Devkant Kesri S/o Late Ghanshyam Kesri Aged About 29 Years R/o 32-180 Mannu Chowk Natraj Sweet ,tikrapara Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) 2 along with CRMP No. 2281 of 2018 Gaurav Dewangan S/o Shri S.K. Dewangan Aged About 34 Years R/o- Qr. No. 3/13, Street No. 41, Sector-7, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus Shri Ashish Chavre S/o Shri B.L. Charve Aged About 32 Years R/o- 37/645 Ram Das Nagar Tikrapara Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) along with CRMP No. 2290 of 2018 Gaurav Dewangan S/o Shri S. K. Dewangan Aged About 34 Years R/o at Present Qr. No. 3/13 Street No. 41 Sector -7, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus Shri Sanjay Singh S/o Shri B.P. Kurre Aged About 34 Years R/o House No. 13 Opp. Gitanjli Apartment Marimai Road Bharat Chowk Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.Mobile - 9827156563., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sameer Uraon, Advocate along with Ms. Anuja Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 13.01.2025 Order on Board 1. Heard, Mr. Sameer Uraon, Advocate along with Ms. Anuja Sharma, Advocate appearing for the petitioner. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the respondents to press all petitions when the case is called out. 3 2. The instant CRMP No. 2185/2018 filed by the petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and in exercise thereof admit the petition, call for the records and after hearing the parties in the matter, quash the entire proceedings pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Bilaspur under Case No.172/17 (Shri Netram Sahu V. Gaurav Dewangan) being abuse of process of court and abuse of process of law and/or pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case..” 3. The instant CRMP No. 2186/2018 filed by the petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and in exercise thereof admit the petition, call for the records and after hearing the parties in the matter, quash the entire proceedings pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Bilaspur under Case No.173/17 (Shri Manish Soni V. Gaurav Dewangan) being abuse of process of court and abuse of process of law and/or pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 4. The instant CRMP No. 2247/2018 filed by the petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and in exercise thereof admit the 4 petition, call for the records and after hearing the parties in the matter, quash the entire proceedings pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Bilaspur under Case No.222/17 (Shri Devkant Kesri V. Gaurav Dewangan) being abuse of process of court and abuse of process of law and/or pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 5. The instant CRMP No. 2281/2018 filed by the petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and in exercise thereof admit the petition, call for the records and after hearing the parties in the matter, quash the entire proceedings pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Bilaspur under Case No.308/17 (Shri Ashish Chavre V. Gaurav Dewangan) being abuse of process of court and abuse of process of law and/or pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 6. The instant CRMP No. 2290/2018 filed by the petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and in exercise thereof admit the petition, call for the records and after hearing the parties in the matter, quash the entire proceedings pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Bilaspur under Case No.224/17 (Shri Sanjay Singh V. Gaurav Dewangan) being abuse of process of court and abuse of process of law and/or pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court 5 may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 7. Mr. Sameer Uraon, counsel for the petitioner submitted that his client is not responding. 8. It appears that the petitioner has no interest in pursuing the matter due to efÒux of time. Moreover, it transpires from the order sheet that there was no interim order passed in the present case. 9. Accordingly, all the petitions are dismissed on this ground alone. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan