Nafr High Court
Case Details
1 2025:CGHC:35007 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8207 of 2025 1 - Smt. Parwati Singh W/o Krishna Kumar Paikra Aged About 39 Years Presently Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Baigapara, Block - Udaypur, District - Surguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Surguja, District - Surguja (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Surguja, District - Surguja (C.G.) 7 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Surguja, District - Surguja (C.G.) 8 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Udaypur, District - Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondents Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 2025:CGHC:35008 NAFR
Facts
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8215 of 2025 1 - Abhishek Kerketta S/o Floronsyus Aged About 40 Years Presently Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Butupara (Gumga), Block - Udaypur, District - Surguja (C.G.) versus ... Petitioner 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Surguja, District - Surguja (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Surguja, District - Surguja (C.G.) 7 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Surguja, District - Surguja (C.G.) 8 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Udaypur, District - Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondents 3 2025:CGHC:35009 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8230 of 2025 1 - Mahendra Prasad Gupta S/o Vindhyachal Prasad Gupta Aged About 47 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Koterbuda, Block Udaypur, District Surguja (C.G.) versus ... Petitioner 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Surguja, District Surguja (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Surguja, District Surguja (C.G.) 7 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Surguja, District Surguja (C.G.) 8 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Udaypur, District Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondents 4 2025:CGHC:35010 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8231 of 2025
Legal Reasoning
respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023, has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, these petitions may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make their representation to the competent authority in light of order dated 28/02/2024 passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel oppose the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 5. Against the order passed in WA No.261 of 2023, the State preferred a review petition bearing REVP No. 147 of 2024, which was considered and rejected by a detailed order. There against the State filed an SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court bearing SLP(C) No. 58525 of 2024, which was dismissed by order dated 17-03-2025. 6. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for 6
Arguments
1 - Smt. Vipin Ekka W/o Pradeep Ekka Aged About 45 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Butupar) Block Udaypur District - Surguja (C.G.) versus ... Petitioner 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instrucation Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Surguja District - Surguja (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Surguja District - Surguja (C.G.) 7 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Surguja District - Surguja (C.G.) 8 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Udaypur District - Surguja (C.G.) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. R.V. Ram Rajwade, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. Suyash Dhar Badgaiya, Deputy Govt. Advocate, 5 Mr. S. Choubey, Mr. Shreyansh Mehta and Mr. K.S. Saini, Panel Lawyers. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 22-07-2025 1. By the present writ petitions, the petitioners are seeking direction towards the respondent authorities for grant of Krmonnati Vetanman on completion of 10 years of service in view of the order dated 28-02-2024 passed by the Division Bench of this High Court in WA No. 261/2023 and also as per circular dated 10-03-2017 issued by the State Government of C.G. 2. The claim of the petitioners is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has also been issued by the
Decision
the petitioners, these petitions at this stage are disposed of permitting the petitioners to make their representation raising all grounds as raised in these writ petitions to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation(s) being made, it is expected that the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of receipt of such representation(s). It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 7. With the aforesaid observation, all these writ petitions are disposed of. Aadil Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge