Nizamuddin Ansari @ Basarat v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail refused
In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed as
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed as withdrawn leaving it open to the applicant to take appropriate steps at appropriate stage, if any cause of action arises.
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1041 of 2025 Nizamuddin Ansari @ Basarat Son Of Late Suleman Ali Ansari Aged About 75 Years Resident Of Village Jur, Post Banja, Police Chowki Basdei, Police Station Surajpur Tahsil Bhaiyathan District Surajpur (C.G.) versus ... Applicant State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer Police Of Police Station Jainagar, District – Surajpur (C.G.) ---- Non-applicant For Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Gulati, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Dr. Sourabh K. Pande, Dy. Advocate General, as well as Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Govt. Advocate. RAJSHEKHAR SONI RAJSHEKHAR SONI
17.07.2025 Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board
This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicants, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No. 131/2025 registered at Police Station – Jainagar, District – Surajpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Section 10 of the Chhattisgarh Protection of Depositors Interest Act, 2005. 2
The learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this instant bail application, with the liberty that if any cause of action arises, he would take recourse of law.
Learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.
Permission is granted.
Operative part
In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed as withdrawn leaving it open to the applicant to take appropriate steps at appropriate stage, if any cause of action arises.
Let a certified copy of this order be send to the concerned trial Court for necessary compliance and follow up action, if any. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the instant bail application is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 3(5), 318(4); Chhattisgarh Protection of Depositors Interest Act, 2005 — s. 10.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.