Nafr High Court
Case Details
1 2025:CGHC:21735 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Order reserved on : 12-02-2025 Order passed on : 09-05-2025 WPS No. 2331 of 2015 1 - Yadunandan Parchey S/o Late Shri Sadan Lal Parchey Aged About 42 Years R/o Sindhi Colony, Kasturba Nagar, Sharda Temple, Bilaspur P.S. Civil Line, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, 2 - Roma Kanta Palaka S/o Shri Laxman Palaka Aged About 36 Years R/o Sanichari Balmiki Chowk Bilaspur P.S. City Kotwali, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Rajkumar Palaka S/o Late Shri Laxman Palaka Aged About 34 Years R/o Sanichari Balmiki Chowk Bilaspur P.S. City Kotwali, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Jagdish Sindhu Mukhi S/o Shri Ramesh Mukhi Aged About 30 Years R/o Sanichari Balmiki Chowk Bilaspur P.S. City Kotwali, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Sunil Singh S/o Late Laxman Singh Aged About 35 Years R/o Ashok Nagar Jorapara, P.S. Sarkanda, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 6 - Uttam Kumar Chhadi S/o Late Shri Gariba Chhadi Aged About 30 Years R/o Devridih Old Power, P.S. Torva, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 7 - Jitendra Muger S/o Late Shri Laxman Muger Aged About 35 Years R/o Sarkanda Behind Muktidham P.S. Sarkanda Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh --- Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Medical Education Chhattisgarh Old Nurses Hostel D.K.S. Bhawan Compound Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Dean Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Science Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh --- Respondents WPS No. 2334 of 2015 1 - Jhumuk Lal Bhoi S/o Faguram Bhoi Aged About 43 Years R/o. Katiyapara Udai Chowk, Police Station-City Kotwali, Civil And Revenue Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
Legal Reasoning
2 - Anil Lal Shrivastava S/o Late Shri Ramlal Shrivastava Aged About 38 Years R/o Behind City Kotwali, Telipara, P.S.- City Kotwali, Civil And Revenue Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 3 - Sanjay Shriwas S/o Shri Hemlal Shriwas Aged About 35 Years R/o Gondpara, Bilaspur, P.S.- City Kotwali, Civil And Revenue Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Lata Bai W/o Late Shri Santosh Rajak Aged About 42 Years R/o Chatapara, P.S.- Civil Line, Civil And Revenue Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Panchuram Kenwat S/o Late Shri Arjun Ram Kenwat Aged About 35 Years R/o Chingrajpara, Seepat Road, Sarkanda, P.S.- Sarkanda, Civil And Revenue Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - Shobha Gangapurvar W/o Shekhar Gangapurvar Aged About 52 Years R/o Ashok Nagar, Sarkanda, P.S.- Sarkanda, Civil And Revenue Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director, Medical Education, Chhattisgarh Old Nurses Hostel D.K.S. Bhawan, Compound- Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, 3 - The Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Dean Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Science Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh --- Respondents 4 WPS No. 2249 of 2015 1 - Harishankar Kashyap S/o Mohan Lal Kashyap Aged About 33 Years Presently Posted As O.T. Technician, Posted At- Department Of Anesthesia, CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur, R/o Near Government Primary School, Ward No. 3, Lalkhadan, P.S. Torwa, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Jayanti Kashyap W/o Santosh Rao Aged About 33 Years Presently Posted As O.T. Technician, Posted At Department Of Anesthesia, CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur, R/o Krishna Enclave, Sarkanda, P.S. Sarkanda, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Domnik Lakra D/o Christopher Lakra Aged About 40 Years Presently Posted As- O.T. Technician, Posted At Department Of Anesthesia, CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur, R/o C/o H. Kujur,village- Mangla, Post- Mangla, P.S. Civil Line, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Vinish Joy S/o Late K.N. Joy Aged About 39 Years Presently Posted As O.T. Technician, Posted At Department Of Anesthesia, CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur, R/o C/o Lokeshwar Singh 27 Kholi, Church Road, P.S. Civil Line, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Ravindra Kumar Nishad S/o Mantram Nishad Aged About 41 Years Presently Posted As- O.T. Technician, Posted At- Department Of Anesthesia, CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur, R/o Bihari Kirana, Ward No. 03, Nagar Panchayat Sirgitti, P.S. Sirgitti, Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---Petitioners Versus 5 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Medical Education, Chhattisgarh Old Nurses Hospital DKS Bhawan, Compound, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Dean, Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Science Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh -- Respondents WPS No. 2250 of 2015 1 - Nageshwari Sidar W/o Ishwar Singh Aged About 32 Years Presently Posted As - Nishchetna Technician, Posted At- CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur R/o Block Colony Simga PS Simga, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 2 - Aruna Soni W/o Shailndra Soni Aged About 41 Years Presently Posted As- Nishchetna Techinician, Posted At- CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur R/o Near SBT Collage Mangla Road, Kurudand Bilaspur, PS Civil Lines District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, ---Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director, Medical Education, Chhattisgarh Old Nurses Hostel D.K.S. Bhawan, Compound- Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 6 4 - The Dean, Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Science Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh --- Respondents WPS No. 2251 of 2015 1 - Sharda Kaushik S/o Rajendra Kumar Kaushik Aged About 32 Years Presently Posted As- O.T. Technician, Posted At- Department Of Anesthesia, CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur R/o Narmada Vihar, Yadunandan Nagar, Tifra Bilaspur PS Sirgitti District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Sulochna Sahu W/o Anil Kumar Sahu Aged About 34 Years Presently Posted As- O.T. Technician, Posted At- Department Of Anesthesia, CIMS Hospital, Bilaspur R/o Anand Manglam Bhawan, Behind Basant Vatika Marriage Hall Surya Vihar Sipat Road Sarkanda PS Sarkanda District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Director, Medical Education, Chhattisgarh Old Nurses Hostel D.K.S. Bhawan, Compound- Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Dean Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Science Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 7 --- Respondents WPS No. 259 of 2016 C. K. Sharma (Wrongly Mentioned As Chandra Shekhar Sharma In Notice Dated 01.06.2015) S/o Shri Rambaran Ram, Aged About 45 Years R/o Devrikhurd, Chandrashekhar Aazad Nagar, Police Station - Torwa, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director, Medical Education, Chhattisgarh Old Nurses Hostel D. K. S. Bhawan, Compound - Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Dean Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Science Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Prateek Sharma and Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocates. For Respondents : Mr. Ajay Pandey, Govt. Advocate. Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey, J C A V Order Since the issue involved in this batch of writ petitions is the
Decision
same, they are being disposed of by this common order. 8 02. By way of these petitions, the petitioners are challenging the notice/order dated 1.6.2015 issued by Dean, CIMS, Bilaspur (Annexure P/1) terminating their services w.e.f. 30.6.2015 as also challenging the advertisement dated 15.6.2015 (Annexure P/2) issued by Dean, CIMS inviting applications for contractual appointment on various posts including the posts from which the petitioners are being terminated. 03. Brief facts of the case necessary for adjudication of these petitions are that the petitioners were appointed on contractual basis for a period of one year on the posts of OT Technician, Nischetna Technician, Sweeper, Ward Boy and Cook in the years 1996, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005 and 2008. During the course of their contractual service, the petitioners made representation before the Hon’ble Chief Minister, State of CG on 7.6.2012 for regularization of their services and copy of the representation dated 31.7.2012 was submitted before the Director, Health Education, Chhattisgarh vide Annexure P/4. As the grievance of the petitioners was not resolved, they went on strike. On 5.4.2011 it was amicably resolved between the petitioners and Dean, CIMS that as per meeting held on 4.4.2011 in the office of Director, Medical Education, Raipur, the contractual employees working in CIMS for more than five years till decision on their regularization is taken, will be continued and advertisement for regular appointment shall be kept in abeyance, and if any fresh advertisement is issued, the case of the petitioners will be considered for granting them benefit, seniority and age relaxation. Copy of the compromise dated 5.4.2011 signed by the 9 Dean, CIMS, is filed as Annexure P/5. The respondent/Dean also issued experience certificates and No Objection Certificate to the petitioners. However, on 1.6.2016 the respondent/Dean issued the impugned notice/order terminating the services of the petitioners w.e.f. 30.6.2015 under the provisions of CG Civil Sewa (Samvida Niyukti) Niyam, 2012 as they have completed the maximum period of five years and thereafter, issued impugned advertisement inviting applications for contractual appointment on various posts including the posts from which the petitioners are being terminated. Hence these petitions. 04. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that issuance of impugned advertisement is unwarranted for the reason that a contract/temporary employee cannot be replaced by another contract/temporary employee and the same is against the dictum of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. It was resolved amicably between the petitioners and respondent/Dean, CIMS after meeting with Director, Medical Education, Raipur that services of the contractual employees working in CIMS for more than five years till decision on their regularization is taken, will be continued and advertisement for regular appointment shall be kept in abeyance and if any fresh advertisement is issued, the case of the petitioners will be considered for granting them benefit, seniority and age relaxation. Learned counsel for the petitioners further argued that the impugned termination notice is illegal as there is no impediment of 10 maximum limit of five years in the said Contract Rules, 2012. They further argued that the State of CG, Department of General Administration, vide letter dated 17.1.2014 categorically stated that daily wagers/contractual class-III and class-IV employees will get the benefits of direct recruitment and for this a policy is to be framed but instead of following this direction, a fresh advertisement is issued for appointment of contractual employees again. Learned counsel for the petitioners contend that through notification dated 31.3.2015 an amendment in the CG Civil Sewa (Samvida Niyukti) Niyam, 2012 has been issued in sub-rule (3) of Rule 15 which stipulates recording of Confidential Report/Performance Appraisal Report of contractual employees which shall be considered for the purpose of extension of their services or for further appointment on contract basis. The petitioners’ performance has always been excellent or very good but without following the rules, their services were terminated arbitrarily. Therefore, the impugned notice and advertisement are liable to be set aside and the respondent/Dean be directed to allow the petitioners to perform their duties on their respective posts. Reliance has been placed on the decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matters of Soni Dineshbhai Manilal and others Vs. Jagjivan Mulchand Chokshi, (2007) 13 SCC 293 and Manish Gupta and others Vs. President, Jan Bhagidari Samiti and others, (2022) 15 SCC 540. 11 05. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would submit that the impugned notice/order of termination has been issued strictly in accordance with law and by following the principal of natural justice as prior to their termination, they were issued one month’s notice in advance. The petitioners have utterly failed to demonstrate any infirmity or illegality in the impugned notice/order to make out a case for interference by this Court. The impugned advertisement has been issued by a competent authority for contractual appointment of OT Technician, Nischetna Technician, Ward Boy and Sweeper in Trauma Unit which was recently established in CIMS. He would next submit that the impugned advertisement has already been cancelled due to some technical reasons like reservation etc. and a notice was duly published in this regard in the newspaper vide Annexure R/1 in WPS No.259/2016. On 3.5.2023 the State Government took a decision to fill up the vacant posts of Class-III and IV cadre on permanent basis through CG Professional Examination Board and pursuant thereto, by letter dated 10.5.2023 of the Director, Medical Education, Chhattisgarh, all the concerned authorities were directed to provide vacancies to be filled up in the institutions alongwith advertisement. Thereafter, the Joint Director and Superintendent, CIMS, Bilaspur sent a proposal for filling up vacant posts of Class-III and IV cadre on permanent basis in CIMS along with advertisement to the Director and sought approval on it. Copy of the letter dated 23.5.2023 with the advertisement and letter dated 10.5.2023 is 12 collectively filed as Annexure R/2. All these petitions lack any substance and are thus liable to be dismissed. Reliance has been placed on the decision in the matter of State of Maharashtra And others Vs. Anita and another, (2016) 8 SCC 293 and Yogesh Mahajan Vs. Professor RC Deka, Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, (2018) 3 SCC 218. 06. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 07. It is an admitted position in all these petitions that all the petitioners were working in CIMS, Bilaspur from the year 1996, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005 and 2008 on the post of OT Technician, Nischetna Technician, Sweeper, Ward Boy and Cook on contractual basis. The petitioners have also filed copy of their appointment orders. The terms and conditions of their appointment orders are as under: “1 सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) सं(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:6) ेሰ(cid:9) सिसं्ቛ(cid:12) ेሰ(cid:6)सिसंक एकेሰ(cid:15)श्त रा(cid:6)सि(cid:19) (cid:4)(cid:7)तन दा(cid:7)य हो(cid:23)गी(cid:25)। इसंक(cid:7) अवितरिराक्त क(cid:23)ई वि(cid:4)(cid:19)(cid:7)ष (cid:4)(cid:7)तन ेሰहो(cid:2)गी(cid:6)ई भቈኋ(cid:6), ्ቌवितपू%ቔኌत’ भቈኋ( गी)हो भ(cid:6)़(cid:6) भቈኋ(cid:6) इत्य(cid:6)दिदा नहो- दिदाय(cid:6) जा(cid:6)य(cid:7)गी(cid:6) तथा(cid:6) सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) विनय(cid:15)ሹኌक्त क(cid:7) अधी(cid:25)न (cid:4)(cid:6)ቔኌष’क (cid:4)(cid:2)तन(cid:4))ቍኌ3 क4 पू(cid:6)्ቔत(cid:6) नहो- हो(cid:23)गी(cid:25)। 2 सं(cid:25)धी(cid:25) भत6 सं(cid:7) सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) पूरा विनय(cid:15)ሹኌक्त केሰ(cid:12)चा(cid:6)रा(cid:25) क(cid:23) ्ቚत्य(cid:7)क क(cid:7) ले(cid:7)ण्डरा (cid:4)ष(cid:12) ेሰ(cid:9) 18 दिदान( क(cid:6) आकቦኌ>ेሰक अ(cid:4)क(cid:6)(cid:19) तथा(cid:6) 03 दिदान(cid:6)(cid:2)क क(cid:6) ऐሹኌ@क अ(cid:4)क(cid:6)(cid:19) क4 पू(cid:6)्ቔत(cid:6) हो(cid:23)गी(cid:25)। 1 (cid:4)ष(cid:12) क(cid:7) ेሰध्य ेሰ(cid:9) विनय(cid:15)ሹኌक्त हो(cid:23)न(cid:7) अथा(cid:4)(cid:6) सं(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:6)ेሰ(cid:15)क्त हो(cid:23)न(cid:7) पूरा आकቦኌ>ेሰक अ(cid:4)क(cid:6)(cid:19) क4 पू(cid:6)्ቔत(cid:6) क4 गीणन(cid:6) ेሰ(cid:9) अपू%ण(cid:12) दिदा(cid:4)सं क(cid:23) आगी(cid:6)ेሰ(cid:25) पू%ण(cid:12) दिदा(cid:4)सं सं(cid:7) पू%ण(cid:12)विकत विकय(cid:6) जा(cid:6)य(cid:7)गी(cid:6) वि(cid:4)ቦኋ(cid:6)ेሰ(cid:6)(cid:4)क(cid:6)(cid:19) वि(cid:4)भ(cid:6)गी( क(cid:7) क(cid:7) ले(cid:7)ण्डरा (cid:4)ष(cid:12) क(cid:6) त(cid:6)त्पूय(cid:12) 12 ेሰ(cid:6)हो क4 (cid:4)(cid:6)>तवि(cid:4)क सं(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:6) सं(cid:7) 13 लेगीय(cid:6) जा(cid:6)य(cid:7)गी(cid:6)। 3 सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) विनय(cid:15)क्त ्ቤሹኌक्त क(cid:23) ቍኌजासं पूदा पूरा विनय(cid:15)ሹኌक्त दाE गीई होF उसं पूदा क(cid:7) संेሰक्ቌ (cid:19)(cid:6)संक4य सं(cid:7)(cid:4)क( क(cid:7) संेሰ(cid:6)न य(cid:6)्ቔ(cid:6) भቈኋ(cid:7) क4 पू(cid:6)्ቔत(cid:6) हो(cid:23)गी(cid:25)। 4 सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) पूरा विनय(cid:15)क्त ्ቤሹኌक्त छ०गी० सिसंवि(cid:4)ले सं(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:6) (आचाराण) विनयेሰ 1965 सं(cid:7) (cid:19)(cid:6)सिसंत हो(गी(cid:7)। 5 विनय(cid:15)ሹኌक्त क(cid:7) दाJरा(cid:6)न दा(cid:23)न( पू्ቌ( ेሰ(cid:9) सं(cid:7) विकसं(cid:25) एक पू्ቌ ቛኋ(cid:6)रा(cid:6) एक ेሰ(cid:6)हो क4 पू%(cid:4)(cid:12) सं%चान(cid:6) य(cid:6) इसंक(cid:7) ए(cid:4)जा ेሰ(cid:9) एक ेሰ(cid:6)्ቔ क(cid:6) (cid:4)(cid:7)तन दा(cid:7)करा विनय(cid:15)ሹኌक्त संेሰ(cid:6)प्त क4 जा(cid:6) संक(cid:7) गी(cid:25)। 6. सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) पूरा विनय(cid:15)क्त ्ቤሹኌक्त क(cid:23) सं(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:6) संेሰ(cid:6)ኌप्त पूቐኋ(cid:6)तO सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) विनय(cid:15)ሹኌक्त (cid:19)(cid:6)संक4य सं(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:6) क(cid:7) रूपू ेሰ(cid:9) ቍኌजातन(cid:25) अ(cid:4)धिधी तक सं(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:6) दाE गीई होF उसं अ(cid:4)धिधी क(cid:7) सिलेए विकसं(cid:25) भ(cid:25) ्ቚक(cid:6)रा क(cid:7) पू(cid:9)(cid:19)न उपू(cid:6)दान य(cid:6) ेሰ)त्य(cid:15) ले(cid:6)ेሰ आदिदा पू(cid:6)्ቔत(cid:6) नहो- हो(cid:23)गी(cid:25)। 7. सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) पूरा विनय(cid:15)क्त केሰ(cid:12)चा(cid:6)रा(cid:25) क(cid:6) गी(cid:23)पून(cid:25)य ्ቚवित्ቛले विकय(cid:6) जा(cid:6)एगी(cid:6) त(cid:6)विक यदिदा आगी(cid:6)ेሰ(cid:25) (cid:4)ष(cid:12) हो(cid:7)त(cid:15) पू(cid:15)नR सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) विनय(cid:15)ሹኌक्त जा(cid:6)न(cid:25) हो(cid:23) त(cid:23) इसंक(cid:7) आधी(cid:6)रा पूरा क(cid:6)य(cid:12) क(cid:6) ेሰ(cid:15)ल्य(cid:6)(cid:2)कन हो(cid:23) संक(cid:9) । 8 सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) विनय(cid:15)क्त केሰ(cid:12)चा(cid:6)रिराय( क4 अपून(cid:7) पूरिरा(cid:4)(cid:6)रा क(cid:7) सं(cid:6)ेሰ(cid:6)ቍኌजाक सं(cid:15)रा्ቌ(cid:6) क(cid:7) सिलेए सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) रा(cid:6)सि(cid:19) क(cid:6) केሰ सं(cid:7) केሰ 6 ्ቚवित(cid:19)त रा(cid:6)सि(cid:19) जा(cid:25)(cid:4)न बी(cid:25)ेሰ(cid:6) पू(cid:7)(cid:19)न य(cid:23)जान(cid:6) अथा(cid:4)(cid:6) पू(cid:25). पू(cid:25). ए्ቛ. ेሰ(cid:9) जाेሰ(cid:6) करान(cid:25) हो(cid:23)गी(cid:25). विक केሰ(cid:12)चा(cid:6)रा(cid:25) ቛኋ(cid:6)रा(cid:6) विकसं य(cid:23)जान(cid:6) क(cid:6) (cid:4)राण विकय(cid:6) गीय(cid:6)। 9 सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) विनय(cid:15)ሹኌक्त उल्ले(cid:7)खिVत सं(cid:2)ቝኋ(cid:6) क(cid:7) सिलेए क4 गीई होF सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) अ(cid:4)धिधी बी़በ(cid:6)ई जा(cid:6)न(cid:7) क4 ሹኌቝኋवित ेሰ(cid:9) इसं पूदाቝኋ(cid:6)पून(cid:6) ेሰ(cid:9) क(cid:23)ई पूरिरा(cid:4)त(cid:12)न नहो- विकय(cid:6) जा(cid:6)(cid:4)(cid:7)गी(cid:6)। 10 संसं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) विनय(cid:15)क्त केሰ(cid:12)चा(cid:6)रा(cid:25) क(cid:23) सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) क4 सं्ቘण(cid:12) अ(cid:4)धिधी। पूदाቝኋ(cid:6)पून(cid:6) क(cid:7) ेሰ(cid:15)ख्य(cid:6)लेय पूरा विन(cid:4)(cid:6)सं करान(cid:6) अविन(cid:4)(cid:6)य(cid:12) होF अन्यथा(cid:6) कሹኌण्डक(cid:6) ikap क(cid:7) अन(cid:15)सं(cid:6)रा एक ेሰ(cid:6)हो क4 सं%चान(cid:6) दा(cid:7)करा सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) विनय(cid:15)ሹኌक्त संेሰ(cid:6)प्त क4 जा(cid:6)एगी(cid:25)। 14 11 सं(cid:2)वि(cid:4)दा(cid:6) विनय(cid:15)क्त अधिधीक(cid:6)रा(cid:25)/ केሰ(cid:12)चा(cid:6)रा(cid:25) क(cid:6) अधिधी्त(cid:6) छቈኋ(cid:25)संगी़በ आय(cid:15)ቔኌ(cid:4)’ሺኋ(cid:6)न सं(cid:2)ቝኋ(cid:6)न (सिसंम्सं) विबीले(cid:6)सं(cid:15)पूरा क(cid:7) ेሰ(cid:6)गी(cid:12) दा(cid:19)(cid:12)न ेሰ(cid:9) क(cid:6)य(cid:12) करान(cid:6) हो(cid:23)गी(cid:6) औरा (cid:19)(cid:6)संक4य क(cid:6)य(cid:12)्ቅेሰ( क(cid:7) विकय(cid:6)न्(cid:4)यन ेሰ(cid:9) संहोय(cid:23)गी करान(cid:6) हो(cid:23)गी(cid:6)। 12 यदिदा इन विनयेሰ( क(cid:7) विन(cid:4)(cid:12)चान क(cid:7) सं(cid:2)बी(cid:2)धी ेሰ(cid:9) क(cid:23)ई ्ቚ् उदाOधी)त हो(cid:23) त(cid:23) उसं पूरा रा(cid:6)ज्यपू(cid:6)ले क(cid:6) विनण(cid:12)य अ(cid:2)वितेሰ हो(cid:23)गी(cid:6)।" 08. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Anita and another (supra) held in paras 15 & 16 of its judgment as under: “15. The above terms of the agreement further reiterate the stand of the State that the appointments were purely contractual and that the respondents shall not be entitled to claim any right or interest of permanent service in the Government. The appointments of the respondents were made initially for eleven months but were renewed twice and after serving the maximum contractual period, the services of the respondents came to an end and the Government initiated a fresh process of selection. The conditions of the respondents' engagement are governed by the terms of agreement. After having accepted the contractual appointment, the respondents are estopped from challenging the terms of their appointment. Furthermore, the respondents are not precluded from applying for the said posts afresh subject to the satisfaction of other eligibility criteria. 16. The High Court did not keep in view the various clauses in the Government Resolutions dated 21-8-2006 and 15-9-2006 and also the terms of the agreement entered into by the respondents with the Government. Creation of posts was only for administrative purposes for sanction of the amount towards expenditure incurred but merely because the posts were created, 15 they cannot be held to be permanent in nature. When the Government has taken a policy decision to fill up 471 posts of Legal Advisors, Law Officers and Law Instructors on contractual basis, the Tribunal and the High Court ought not to have interfered with the policy decision to hold that the appointments are permanent in nature.” 09. In the matter of Yogesh Mahajan (supra) the Hon’ble Apex Court held in paras 6 & 7of its judgment as under: “6. It is settled law that no contract employee has a right to have his or her contract renewed from time to time. That being so, we are in agreement with the Central Administrative Tribunal and the High Court that the petitioner was unable to show any statutory or other right to have his contract extended beyond 30- 6-2010. At best, the petitioner could claim that the authorities concerned should consider extending his contract. We find that in fact due consideration was given to this and in spite of a favourable recommendation having been made, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences did not find it appropriate or necessary to continue with his services on a contractual basis. We do not find any arbitrariness in the view taken by the authorities concerned and therefore reject this contention of the petitioner. 7. We are also in agreement with the view expressed by the Central Administrative Tribunal and the High Court that the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of the decision of this Court in Umadevi (3)¹. There is nothing on record to indicate that the appointment of the petitioner on a contractual basis or on an ad hoc basis was made in accordance with any regular procedure or by following the necessary rules. That being so, no right accrues in favour of the petitioner for regularisation of his 16 services. The decision in Umadevi (3)1 does not advance the case of the petitioner.” 10. In the present case also it is not in dispute that all the petitioners were appointed on contractual basis for a limited period and as per the respondents, prior to termination of their services they were given one month’s notice in advance. The petitioners have also sought relief of quashment of the impugned advertisement dated 15.6.2015. However, as per Return filed by the respondents, the impugned advertisement has already been cancelled due to some technical reason like reservation etc. and a notice in this regard was duly published in the newspaper (Annexure R/1 in WPS No.259/2016). On 3.5.2023 the State Government took a decision to fill up the vacant posts of Class-III and IV cadre on permanent basis through CG Professional Examination Board. Thus, looking the aforesaid guidelines of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the nature of appointment of the petitioners and the terms and conditions of their appointment order, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners having got no accrued right to continue on their respective posts, are not entitled for any relief as claimed. All these writ petitions sans merits and are liable to be dismissed. 11. In the result, the writ petitions being without any substance are hereby dismissed. No order as to cost. MOHD AKHTAR KHAN Digitally signed by MOHD AKHTAR KHAN Date: 2025.05.09 16:53:46 +0530 Khan Sd/ (Rajani Dubey) Judge