✦ Chhattisgarh High Court

Judgment · High Court

SANJAY KUMAR JAISWAL

Case at a glance

Bench
SANJAY KUMAR JAISWAL
Neutral citation
2025:CGHC:23772

Outcome

Dismissed

Accordingly, the revision is hereby dismissed at motion stage

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Learned counsels appearing for the applicant submit that the 2 amount granted by the learned Principal Judge as maintenance is too meager which may be enhanced suitably as the respondent (husband) is working in the Technical Recutor Spleshbi Company and earned Rs.80,000/- per month.…

Judgment

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 686 of 2025 • Smt. Shrishti Singh W/o Pratik Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o At Present Mig, 23 Kailash Nagar, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) Mobile No. [REDACTED] versus ... Applicant • Pratik Singh S/o Shri Shailendra Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Road No. 2/d, Plot No. 347/2, Rishali, Pragati Nagar, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) Mobile No. [REDACTED] ... Respondent For Applicant For Respondent : : Mr. Jitendra Gupta, Advocate Not noticed Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 13/06/ 2025

1.

The present revision has been filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 preferred against the impugned order dated 12.05.2025 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Durg (C.G.) in Case No.1162/2024, wherein amount of Rs. 2,000/- has been granted on an application filed by the applicant herein under Section 144 of BNS.

Operative part

2.

Learned counsels appearing for the applicant submit that the 2 amount granted by the learned Principal Judge as maintenance is too meager which may be enhanced suitably as the respondent (husband) is working in the Technical Recutor Spleshbi Company and earned Rs.80,000/- per month. I have heard learned Counsels appearing for the applicant and perused the documents annexed with the revision including the impugned order. The applicant herein had filed an application under Section 144 of the B.N.S before the Learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Durg (C.G.) for grant of maintenance to Rs.30,000/-. Learned Principal judge after appreciating oral and documentary evidence available on record granted Rs.2,000/- towards maintenance vide impugned order dated 12.05.2025 passed in Case No. 1162/2024. Having carefully examined the impugned order, I find no perversity, illegality, or inconsistency in the findings recorded by the learned Principal Judge. The conclusions appear to be well- reasoned and are duly supported by the oral and documentary evidence available on record. Accordingly, the revision is hereby dismissed at motion stage itself. However, the Family Court is directed to expedite the trial as expeditiously as possible.

7.

Sourabh P. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the revision is hereby dismissed at motion stage

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Family Courts Act, 1984 — s. 19(4); Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 144.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Chhattisgarh High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments