Shiv Kumar Mishra v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
As prayed, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. As prayed, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Soma T.P. Sharma Judge r
Judgment
Shiv Kumar Mishra, S/o- Shri Late Gaurishankar Mishra, Aged About-55 Years, R/o- Awapalli, Thasil- Usur, District- Bijapur (C.G.) RESPONDENT: State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Awapalli, Thasil- Usur, District- Bijapur (C.G.) / PETITION U/S 482 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CQDE, 1973 ^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Criminal Misc. Petition No.593 of 2012 PETITIONER: Shiv Kumar Mishra Versus RESPONDENT: State of Chhattisgarh {Petition under Section 482 ofthe Criminal Procedure Code, 1973} Present: Mr. Vinay Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the State. Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma. J ORDER (17-8-2012)
By this petition under Section 482 of the CrPC, the petitioner has prayed for quashment of FIR registered in Crime No.15/2011 at Police Station Awapalli, Distt. Bijapur for the offence punishable under Sections 294, 506 of the IPC and 3 (1) (xi) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)Act, 1989.
During the course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner files written application for withdrawal of the petition and seeks to withdraw this petition.
3.; The application for withdrawal of the case be taken on record.
Operative part
As prayed, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Soma T.P. Sharma Judge r
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: As prayed, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 294, 506; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention ofAtrocities) Act, 1989.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.