Society Registered With The Registrar Co- Operative Societies Having Its v. Deputy Director
Case at a glance
- Bench
- RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. However, if the petitioner moves an application under Section 75 of Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 before the concerned Director, the authority concerned shall decide it expeditiously, strictly in accordance with the law.…
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 164 of 2017 M/s Indian Coffee Workers Cooperative Society Limited A Co- Operative Society Registered With The Registrar Co- Operative Societies Having Its Registered Office At 592, Malviya Marg, Jabalpur, M.P., Through Its Hony. Jt. Secretary Shri M Prakashan ... Petitioner versus
1. Deputy Director, Employees’ State Insurance Corporation, Ministry Of Labour And Employment, Government Of India, Regional Office, 107, Ram Nagar Road, Kota, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. The Govt. Of Chhattisgarh. Through The Labour Secretary Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh State ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner For respondent No. 1 For State/Respondent No. 2 : Mr. K.R. Nair, Advocate : Mr. Pranav Saxena, Advocate : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board
24.06 .2026
By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief(s):- “10.1. Direct the Respondent to produce the entire records pertaining to the case for its kind perusal.
10.
Issue appropriate writ / writs, order / orders, direction/directions quashing the order dated 02.06.2017 (Annexure P1, passed by the Respondent No.1). 2
10.
Grant any other relief as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of the case.”
2. Mr. Pranav Saxena, Advocate would submit that the order passed by the Deputy Director, Employees’ State Insurance Corporation dated 02.06.2017 can be challenged by filing an application under Section 75 of Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948, and therefore, this petition is not maintainable.
3. At this stage, Mr. Nair would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail remedy available under the law.
No objection from the other side.
Permission granted.
Operative part
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. However, if the petitioner moves an application under Section 75 of Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 before the concerned Director, the authority concerned shall decide it expeditiously, strictly in accordance with the law. $iddhant JUDGE Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.