Smt Shreykunwar Dammani Wd/o v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
PLAINTIFF w^^- (?^p ^y"^':"^ ^'y.-<^' ' •^•' ^<^' ^' ^' \r^ V^VERSUS Late Mohan Lal Dammani, aged about 80 years, R/o Nagar Nigam Colony, Ramsagar para, Raipur Tahsil & District Raipur (C.G.) RESPONDENTS : 1) DEFENDANTS State of Chhattisgarh: Through The Collector Raipur (C.G.) 2) Nagar Palika Nigam Through Commissioner, Nagar Palika Nigam, Raipur (C.G.) SECON^APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE T" "s^ ^•imtfT^w^ ^^i^^ ^-al^4!^, f®«ni^^< ^^^.^s^ •m^ f2_ ^'^9 ^23^ 3?T^?TTI^T (^f3^?) a^n^r ^T'f^w iimar^iFqi^ ^^?w ^ttn ^n^T W^lfepih ^TTR^f ^ f^t ^^R ^•^Rma^T S.B: HON'BLE MRJUSTICE i 13.07.2012: ^x. AGARWAL Mr. Pushkar Ssnha, cour| se! for the appellant. Mr. Sanjeev Agrawa!, PL for the State/respondent No. 1. Counsel for the appeliarjt seeks to withdraw the present appeal with iiberty to file iegally consti^jted appeal. Permisslon granted. | Accordlngly, the secondi appea! is djsmissed as withdrawn with the llberty as aforesaid. No ordjgr as to costs. Sd/- N. K. Agarwal Judge D/- ~^e +
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.