Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
APPLICANT/ Defendant < •^"s 'A^"'" ^" VERSUS NON-APPLICANT/ Plaintiff Cominercial Complex (C.G.) Private Limited, Supela Bhilai, District-Durg through Chairman- Santosh Golchha, S/o Late Shri K.C. Golchha, aged about 55 years, R/o Usha Kiran Malviya Nagar, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) [eharban Singh, S/o Shri Darshan Singh, aged about 40 years, R/o Quarter No. 22, Sindhi Colony, Raipur Naka, Durg, Tahsil & District-Durg (C.G.) CIVIL REVISION UNDER SECTION Fl5 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE XI-HC—78 '3~^r r^j^i^^^ ^til^^Ko^ f®tcni^^< t<mdi ^^j<^ ^^.£.L^.:s.^..L^......, • r- ^ 200 3^T TR^ ((lGlf^<sl<i^) 3^T ^T f<^Jch ^r8TT 3?T^T $F^NT ^TTW^Tft"^ 3TT^T or)i^f<n<fl"i TTP:T^ff ^f fe^ <f^<^K ^sffima^r S.B: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K 16.03.2012: AGARWAL Mr. Prateek Sharma, couns^l fbr the applScant. -. Counsel for the applicant with liberty to fite review petitjon b^f Permission granted. Accordingly, the civil revls|on ^eeks to withdraw this civd revision »^fore the trial Court. is ^isml^ed wtthcfrawn with f the liberty as aforesaid. No order fes to costs. Sd/- N.K. Agrawal Judge ^ 4-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.