Jai Maa Laxmi Women Self Help Group v. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare Naya
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu
Judgment
: Mr.Pankaj Singh, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.Prasoon Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate No.1 to 4/State General Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 2
13.01.2026
Heard Mr.Pankaj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.Prasoon Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for respondent No.1 to 4/State.
By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “A. To quash/set aside the purported Notice Inviting Tender, floated by Respondent No. 3 / Civil Surgeon cum CHS for the year 2023-24 in respect to operation of canteen in the premises of District Hospital, Baikunthpur and the consequent processes undertaken therein which culminated in award of tender to private respondent herein; and B. To quash/ set aside the impugned order dated
16.05.2023, issued by the Respondent No. 3/Civil Surgeon cum CHS and all consequences arising thereof and related thereto; and C. To permit/allow the Petitioner to run the canteen concerned without interference and obstruction of whatsoever nature; and D. To direct an inquiry into the impugned conduct of the Respondent No. 3 / Civil Surgeon cum CHS; and E. To direct the Respondent State to adequately compensate the Petitioner for loss of good-will; and F. To award cost of the present litigation to Petitioner; and/or 3 G. Any other relief(s) in favor of Petitioner as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous as the subject tender has been lapsed.
Operative part
In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.