Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The petition is dismissed as wthdrawn
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 363, 366
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. The petition is dismissed as wthdrawn. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge
Judgment
COaPS OF JUDICIAL MBGISTRATB FIRST CLASS BAMftiNUJGaNG AND SUBSEQ0EBT PROCEEDINGS AS WELL AS OUSSHING THE F.I.R. MALftFIDE CHARGESHEET REGISTERED U/S 363, 366 INDIAN PENAL CODE WHEREIN WHILE THE VICTIM REFUSED TO MftRRY 1'TITH OLD RICHMAN COMPLAINAKT MOEHER REFUSED BE T'O KEEP AS GEJARDIAN AND ADD IN SECTIO»__376_I.P._CODE_BFTER 1 (ONE) YEAR FALSELY EVEN WCTHOUT MEDICAL EXAMINATION REPORT BY DOCTOE. - Contd...2 HIQH COUKT OF GHHATTiSG^tH ATBLASPUR Cr.M.P.Na187<tf2012 Satya Narayan Banjar® Verays
#2. Smt.indudevi (Petition under Section 482 ofthe Cr.P.C. Mr.O.P.Yadav, counset for the petitioner. MrAshish Gupta, Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1 /State. - [SB: Hon'bte Mr. T.P. aiamia, J.) •^A l«,5P«i
#1. By this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. the petftjoner has prayed for quashment of crinninat proceeding pending in the Court of in Criminai Casa Judiciai Magistrate First Ciass, Ramanujganj, No.137/2010.
#2. Learned counsei for the petitioner seeks to withdraw thte petFllon.
#3. The petition is dismissed as wthdrawn. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is dismissed as wthdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 363, 366; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.