Nafr High Court
Case Details
1 2025:CGHC:19815 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3016 of 2025 SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.05.02 16:25:45 +0530 1 - Homan Lal Sahu Krishna Ram Sahu Aged About 45 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 2 - Laxminarayan Sahu S/o Lakhan Lal Sahu Aged About 48 Years
Legal Reasoning
Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 3 - Gyaneshwar Singh Sahu S/o Govind Singh Sahu Aged About 44 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 4 - Vishnu Ram Thakur S/o Seuk Ram Thakur Aged About 50 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 5 - Ajay Kumar Yadav S/o Kanhaiya Lal Yadav Aged About 45 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 6 - Mukesh Roshan Nand S/o Updeo Nand Aged About 49 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 2 7 - Smt. Pratibha Thakur W/o Maheshwar Ram Kotpariya Aged About 42 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 8 - Smt. Indu Thakur W/o Naamdas Manikpuri Aged About 36 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 9 - Smt. Rachana Sharma W/o Vikas Sharma Aged About 41 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 10 - Smt. Vaishali Yadav W/o Manoj Kumar Yadav Aged About 50 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 11 - Smt. Soni Kumari D/o R.K. Singh Aged About 37 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 12 - Pusan Kumar S/o Dayaram Sahu Aged About 49 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 13 - Smt. Rashmi Nand W/o Mukesh Roshan Nand Aged About 49 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) At Govt. Girls High School Karhibhadar, District Balod Chhattisgarh 14 - Smt. Nisha Dwivedi W/o Rakesh Dwivedi Aged About 42 Years Posted As Lecturer (T L B) At Sages Chikhalakasa, District Balod Chhattisgarh. 15 - Smt. Narayani Yadav W/o Sandeep Kumar Yadav Aged About 45 3 Years Posted As Lecturer (T L B) At Sages Chikhalakasa, District Balod Chhattisgarh 16 - Jackline Kerry W/o Mr Robert Kerry Aged About 37 Years Posted As Lecturer (T L B) At Sages Chikhalakasa, District Balod Chhattisgarh 17 - Laxman Singh S/o Mansha Ram Aged About 40 Years Posted As Lecturer (T L B) At Sages Chikhalakasa, District Balod Chhattisgarh 18 - Rumeshwar Kumar Sinha S/o Dayaram Sinha Aged About 61 Years Posted As Ast. Teacher (Science) (E L B) At Pmshri Sages Kaneewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 19 - Smt. Anju Sinha W/o Rumeshwar Kumar Sinha Aged About 55 Years Posted As Ast. Teacher (E L B) At P/s Jamgaon, District Balod Chhattisgarh 20 - Smt. Madhuri Thakur W/o Vishnu Ram Thakur Aged About 44 Years Posted As Ast. Teacher (E L B) At P/s Jamaruwa, District Balod Chhattisgarh 21 - Smt. Mamta Sahu W/o Gyaneshwar Singh Sahu Aged About 43 Years Posted As Ast. Teacher (E L B) At P/s Karhibhadar, District Balod Chhattisgarh 22 - Sheela Sahu D/o Ramgulal Sahu Aged About 32 Years Posted As Ast. Teacher (Science) (T L B) At Sages Chiklakasa, District Balod Chhattisgarh 23 - Vikas Sharma S/o Chowa Prasad Sharma Aged About 45 Years Posted As Teacher (E L B) At M/s Umaradah, District Balod Chhattisgarh 24 - Namita Nikose D/o Madan Lal Nikose Aged About 40 Years Posted As Pti At Pmshri Sages Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh 4 25 - Suresh Kumar Deshmukh S/o Jagdish Prasad Deshmukh Aged About 42 Years Posted As Lecturer (E L B) Kannewada, District Balod Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director, Panchayat And Social Welfare Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chief Executive OfÏcer Jila Panchayat Balod, District Balod (C.G.) 4 - District Education OfÏcer, Balod, District Balod (C.G.) (Cause title taken from CIS) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 01.05.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction towards the respondent authorities for grant of Kramonnati Vetanman on completion of 10 years of service in view of the order dated 28.02.2024 passed by the Division Bench of this High Court in WA No. 261/2023 and also as per circular dated 10.03.2017 5 issued by the State Government of C.G. 2. The claim of the petitioner is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No. 261 of 2023, has also considered the identical issue. The petitioner is also entitled for Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this
Decision
petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the competent authority in light of order dated 28/02/2024 passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 5. Against the order passed in WA No. 261 of 2023, the State preferred a review petition bearing REVP No. 147 of 2024, which was considered and rejected by a detailed order. There against the State filed an SLP before the Supreme Court bearing SLP (C) No. 58525 of 2024, which was dismissed by order dated 17.03.2025. 6. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all 6 relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the competent authority to consider the claim of petitioner on its own merits. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib