CIVIL^EYISION N0 v. Vishveshwar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- BIE T P SHANNA
Outcome
Withdrawn
Consequently, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn with the tiberty
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Consequently, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn with the tiberty availabte under the law. The Registry is directed to retum the certified copy of ttie impugned order subject to petitioner's furnidiina authenticated photocopy of the same. Sd/- T.P.Sharma i Judge n 1
Judgment
.R.No. Presented iiy Shri.<^.t^...YA?:/1.2. .C.^....)3.9....[.'^7...... ^ ••..•—••—,..<.^.»i«»..Utt^i-iifitl<«igi] Banjare Vikas Samiti through1:he President, Ghasi Ram Naik, about 52 years, son of Late Gambhir Naik (Head Office District Shivrinarayan Janjgir Chainpa) Present residence Tikarapara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh RESPONDENTS: 7: VERSUS Vishveshwar, son of Balram Prasad, aged about 50 [fifty] of Temple] [priest years, resident of Shivrinarayan, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janj gir-Charap a, Chhattisgarh State Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Janjgir, District Jdnjgir- Chdmpa, Chhattisgarh HI6H COURT OF CHHATTIS6ARH. BILASPUR (Singie Bench: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Shanna, J) Civil Revision No. 139/2012 {Givii Kevision under oection 115 ot me t-.r.L.J Petitioner yiaintiff) Respondents (Defendants) Naik Banjare V'ikas SamiTi Vs
3. Vishveshwar"
4. State of C.Q. Present: A'sr. J.R. Verma., Auweate for the petitioner. Mr. Q. Aziz, P.L. for the respondent/State. Oral Order (10.9.2012)
By 1+iis revision the petitioner hus challenged tiie legality and propriety . of the order dated 26.07.2012 passed by the Civil Judge Ctass-II, Nawagarh, Oistrict Jdnjgir-Champa in Civil Suit No.08-A/10 thereby dismissing the pkiint as time barred i.e. under ftule 11 (d) of Order 7 CPC
After arguing for some time, teamed counsel for "rtie petitioner seeks to withdraw this revision with liberty to file an oppeal in accordance with Order 41 of CPC. t-te also prays for return of the certified copy of the \- impugned order.
Operative part
Consequently, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn with the tiberty availabte under the law. The Registry is directed to retum the certified copy of ttie impugned order subject to petitioner's furnidiina authenticated photocopy of the same. Sd/- T.P.Sharma i Judge n 1
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Consequently, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn with the tiberty
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.