Judgment · High Court

ySmt. Mamta Thakur, AGE 40 W/o Lok Singh Thakur R/o Kailash Gali, Turi Hatri, Purani Basti, Raipur VERSUS Y. lent^. Lok Singh Thakur, Age 43 Yrs, Plaintiff S/o Late Raghunandan Singh Thakur R/o Raipura, Mahadev Ghat Road, Raipur Appeal Under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984. J^-:'- XI-HC-78 3=oET •^|^ld<4, ^TTl^jl<o, f®l<ril<rl^< F,^^.'7^)/6^ <TTR<tl Sb*1|ch STT^TCRR? (^t3^T) ^ 200 W^T^Tf^TW cTSTT3T1^T$h^ich| 5^TTW ^N ^TT^T cbl^td41-l ^TR^ff ^f fe^ <i^^l< ^^f^T3:n^T DB, : HON'BLE MR. DHlrtEENDRA MISHRA AND HON'BLE MR. SATlt >H K. AGNiHOTRS. JJ. 25-8-2006 /;.."'• Mr. Raja Sharma, counsel flc sr the appellant. The appellant has preferre^ Famjly Courts Act, 1984 againsttl"|( thjs appeal under Section 19 ofthe e impugned order dated 10-1-20(^, ^"""•••"^ by which a sum of Rs.1,000/- by| way of jnterim maintenance and a sum of Rs.2,000/- by way of cost of (itjgation have been awarded jn favour ofthe appellant. However, learned counsel this appea! with liberty to fite appi) the Jaw on fhe ground that the inst| is dismissed The appea! for the appellant seeks to wlthdraw lopriate proceeding available under int appea! is not maintainab!e. |as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Learned counsel for the a{ copyofthe impugned orderfiJed al The office is directed to jmpugned order on appellant |pe!Iant prays for return of certified ^ngwith the appeal. return the certified copy of |iishjng authenticated copy of the V, ,J same. Certifjed copy as per rules. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge i Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Gopat ^ ? o6 ^- P.T.O.