Agrawal v. M/s Electromech Devices Manufacturing Company Address - 15/397, Behind
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
In view of the above, the present arbitration request petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the above, the present arbitration request petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ARBR No. 19 of 2025 M/s Vandana Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (V.I.P.L.) Through Its Director Mr. Subhash Chand Agrawal S/o Lt. N.L. Agrawal, Address - Vandana Building, M.G. Road, Raipur, Tahsil And District - Raipur (C.G.) 492001 versus … Applicant M/s Electromech Devices Manufacturing Company Address - 15/397, Behind Chandak House, Sindhi Panchayat Lane, Jawhar Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil and District - Raipur (C.G.) 492001 ... Respondent For Applicant : Ms. Nidhi Agrawal, Advocate (through video- conferencing). For Respondent : Ms. Priyanka Bajapai, Advocate. PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI 11:47:58 +0530
05.01.2026 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, on Board Order Chief Justice
Heard Ms. Nidhi Agrawal, learned counsel appearing through video- conferencing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. Priyanka Bajpai, learned counsel for the respondent.
This is an application under Sections 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that she seeks to withdraw the present bail application, as the matter is subjudice before the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (MSEFC).
Learned counsel for the respondent opposes this arbitration request 2 application and submits that the matter is pending before the MSEFC.
Operative part
In view of the above, the present arbitration request petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the present arbitration request petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(4).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.