BILASPUR (CG) v. RESPONDbNT

neSBnted ty Shri ^i Wsd...-.^—^ about 39 years, R/o Farid Nagar, Supela, Tahsil and District Durg (C.G.) VERSUS RESPONDbNT State of Chhattisgarh : through Police Station Supela, Distt. Durg (C.G.) APPLICATION UNDER SECTION_482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR QUASHING THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING AGAINST THE APPLICANT S.T. No.273/2006 ^^-fi-as^ KIGH COURT OF CHHATTISQARH A' ?8S f\ C 'wF^ !l«n» Cr W.P.No.688 of 2 >-^4 Irshad All 'vsrsui Reso of Chhattisgarh (Appiicafion under Section 432 ofthe Cr.P.C.) Klr^r'Q !rTQG'3r^'^ TTtr ^i^^ •^*^<r*i*rl-^r*f' l-vi^itw j«/tS&S* il iUi U iS eji/piiv/Gi ii.. n"r &rMir>.f^ CI^tii.^i-ri Q'-sinol ivii ./-ii vii su t-?tiUM<at r~taiii5i ! •'iiiAnj/M'•?*'^y rSn.fi CT't4'/^/rir%<''.*^/M^**«in3niT i-iawyG;! EVI s.ii^ •^i.taio/ii^ispwiiu^ui.. {SS: Hon'Gie Mi T.P. Sharma, J. o (15-3-2012)

#2. By this peiiilon under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. prayed for qusshment of criminal procssding initiated again^ him In S.T.No.273/2006 aileged pending before t'ne 51h Additionai Sessions Judge, Durg on ihe ground thai ofhsr accu^d has been acqul mea D'y' the same Court vide order a'ated 14.5.2007. the appjlcant has The present applicant hss not filed any document to sho'A' pendency of Sessions triai and except the faci in Sesslons tnai ofthe judgmsnt it hss been mentjoned ihat the present appiicsnt has absconded. r^/t Wlihout any maisriai evsn reiating to pendency of such SessioRS iriai, i SG not Tind any grounci ror quasnment. consequentfy, tne petftson is dismissed. f^ <^,r^ip*f>,i •vfS ff\ i^i/^'^ ?ii Sd/- T.P.Sharma Judge