M/s Goldwin Medicare Limited v. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , Department Of Health
Case at a glance
- Neutral citation
- 2026:CGHC:274-DB
Outcome
Withdrawn
As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Madhurima
Judgment
M/s Goldwin Medicare Limited Through Its Director Mr. Randolph Claude Alves, S/o Late Vanning Augustine Alves, Aged About 64 Years, Corporate Office, 101/102, Velankanni Towers, A Wing, Marinagar, Off Senapati Bapat Marg, Mahim (West), Mumbai -400016, ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary , Department Of Health And Family Welfare Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhavan , Atal Nagar , Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Limited Through Its Manging Director North West Commercial Complex, Sector 27, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sabyasachi Bhaduri, Advocate For State For Respondent No. 2 : : Mr. Priyank Rathi, G.A. Mr. Trivikram Nayak, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 05/01/2026 2
Heard Mr. Sabyasachi Bhaduri, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State and Mr. Trivikram Nayak, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2.
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs: “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for record of entire tender process which is subject matter of the present petition.
10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent Corporation to make good remittance of the payment pending to be made to petitioner amounting to Rs. 17,46,605/- along with interest accruing thereon for the goods and services already supplied by the petitioner and Rs. 15,03,612/- deducted by the Respondent vide payment advise 29.09.2021 and Rs. 17,73,693/- deducted b the Respondent vide their payment advise dated 03.02.2022;
10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the illegal deductions 3 made by the respondents for the goods already supplied by the petitioner.
10.4 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s)/order(s)/direction(s) in favour of petitioner, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.
10.5 Cost of the petition.”
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for sometime, prays to withdraw the present petition.
Operative part
As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Madhurima
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: As prayed, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.