Judgment · High Court · 2013
Judgment
Judgment
#1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . i o d e s o p s i d s d n a t s n o i t i t e p e h t , y i g n i d r o c c A . 5 ) e w , y m m a J f o y a d m m s i h t n o ) T R U O C N E P O ( R E D R O d e s s a P ( ‘ 2 1 0 2 F C 4 2 ( 3 5 . O N ) S ( N O i T l T E P W R W R U P S A L I B : H R A G S E T T A H H C F O T R U O C H G ! H } a i d m f o n c i t u t i i s n o C e h t f o 6 2 2 e l c i t r A r e d n u n o i t i t e P t i r W ( . J , m o h i n g A . K h s i t a S i m s e l b ’ n o H : h c n e B e i g n i S . e t a t S e h t r o f l a r e n e G e t a c o v d A . y D . r u k a h T . S . Y i r h S . y e n o i t i t e p e m r o f e t a c o v d A , y e d n a P . K . K i r h S - : t n e s e r P s r e h t O i 8 h r a g s i t t a h h C f o e t a t S S T N E D N O P S E R s u s r e V i f é G t n a k a r d n a h C R E N O m T E P i r t o h i n g A . K h s i t a S - / d S e g d u J k o h s A
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.