AA<r^^A <^$> v. Aditya Chandrakar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. I.A.No.1 stands disposed oF. Soma Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge
Judgment
^Naresh Kumar Agarwal, son of Shri .•--•'"" AA<r^^A <^$> -'^ ^^^ Salik Ram Agarwal, aged about 43 ^.^^:^^^* resident of Ashok Vihar A^LAL ^^ \/;1 .,^^^ yers, ^». ^fAW^ ^ ^"•" ^ ^. RESPONDENTS: ^(Defendants) Colony, Street No.5, Basant Public Schootlst Floor, Flat No.3. Pdndri, Raipur (CG) M,. Aditya Chandrakar, son pf Shri Bharatlal, |resident Budhapara; Shukla Gali, Raipur. :. State of Chhattisgarh, through Col lector, Tehsi 1 bistriGt Rajpur (C.G.) APPEAL UNOER ORDER 43 RULE Kr) OFI THE COOE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 1908 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Miscellaneous Apoeal No.61 oF 2009 APPELLANT/: (PlaintifF) RESPONDENTS/: (DeFendants) Naresh KumarAgarwal Versus
1. Aditya Chandrakar
2. Stabe oF Chhafctisgarh M^ {Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) of the Code oF Civil Procedure, 1908} Present: Mr. Raza Ali, counsel For the appellanL Ms. Renu Singh, counsel For respondent: No.1. Mr. Pawan Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer For fche Sbate/respondent No.2. Sinale Bench: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Shamna. J ORDER (18-9-2013)
Heard.
By this appeal, the appellant has challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 9-2-2009 passed by the 14th Additional District Judge (FTC), Raipur in Civil Suit No.34-A/2008, whereby the application for grant of temporary injunction filed by the appellant in a suib for spedfic perFormance oFconbract:, has been dismissed.
No interim protection has been granfced to the appellant till boday since
Considering the order impugned, nature oF claim and bhe Fact bhat: interim probection has also not: been granbed, infcerFerence in the order impugned. 1 do not: Find any scope For
Consequently, fche appeal is devoid oF merit, same is liable fco be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. No order as bo cosbs.
However, considering the nature oF dispute, in case of pendency oF brial, the trial Court is direcbed to expedite the trial and decide the case as early as possible preFerably within six months From the next: date fixed, if a copy of bhis order is filed on behalF oF the appellant within two days from today before the brial Court.
I.A.No.1 stands disposed oF. Soma Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.