Late Shri Ghasiram fftp^aX v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 14 Jan 2005
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 226, 227
- Commodities Act, 1955
Judgment
Late Shri Ghasiram fftp^aX. , Aged years, R/o Village- Bhaiyathan, Post Surajpur, District 52 Surguja, (C.G.). .o^^y ^^/•-c^^' \ , ^yy^y.-'" '^1 VERSUS
State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Principal Secretaiy Department of Food and Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.).
The Collector, (Food) Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). f
The Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue), Surguja (C.G.). Surajpur, District
The Assistant Food OfBcer, Surajpur, District Surguja, (C.G.). .0 ^ ~_^\ ;^-»° ^-^y&• N;,/-;^..-.^:^-.- '%^> ''<><,> ^''^
Surguja avam Jashpur Developnient Authority, Through: The Chief Executive Officer, Ambikapur, District Surguja, (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS/CERTIORARI ETC. OR DIRECTION/ORDER IN THE LIKE NATURE ETC. 's'felits -S^ ^qpTi^^, •^fteT^, rai<rl!y^< ^.P-iOB. T>6'% | Hon. Shri Fakhruddin. Ao. C.J..& Hon. SW V.K. Shrivastava. J Shri A.N. Pandey for the petition^rs. Shri Prashant Mishrc, Addl. Advcjcate ©enerai, for the Stote. Heard. Learned Add!. A.G. pointed out t|at in sxercise of the power j:onferr£d by Section 3 of the Essentic^l Commodities Act, 1955 (10 jsf 1955) read with the Public Distribuljion System (Control) Order ^io. i5SR 630(E) dated 31/8/2001, the Sjtate Government has passed (•he Chhattisgarh Public Distribution S^stem (Control) Order 2004 |and clause 21 of the Order repeals the Chhottisgarh (Khadya Psdartho) Sdpvajanik Nagrik PoortJ Vitaran Scheme, 2001, I'herefore, this petition has become mfr|uctuous. An application for dismissing t(ie petition as having been •endered infructuous has olso been file^l by the State. The spplication is a!lowed. Ths writ petition stands dispose^ of as havin9 been rendered infructuous. I Consequently, s!l the pending ^A.W.P.s & I.A.s atso stand Sd/- A ^.ChiefJustice Gi: PRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50,000. ^fy Sd//- V.K.Shrivastava Judge
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227; Commodities Act, 1955.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Chhattisgarh High Court, on 14 Jan 2005.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.