Abraham v. Surendra Singh
Case at a glance
- Bench
- N K AGARWAL
Outcome
Withdrawn
bn is dismissed as withdrawn with the
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Abraham Kerketta, age 56 years. Smt. Argen Kerketta w/o Abraham Kerketta, age 52 years. Ku. Ritika Kerketta d/o Late James through Kerketta, age 03 years, - Grand mother natural guardian Argen. All by caste Uraon, R/o village Hari, Tahsil Manora, District Jashpur (C.G.) Present Resident of village Gajma, Tahsil Manora, District Jashpur (c.G.) VERSUS .RESPONDENTS :1 Surendra Singh s/o Bacchulal Singh, aged about 46 years, Occupation- Driver, R/o village Dipatoli, Jashpur Jain Mandir), Tahsil & (Behind DistrictJashpur(C.G.) f^ ^A-' 4 Singh 2,(A) Smt. Chintamani w/o Surendra Singh, r/o village Dipatoli, Jashpur, Tahsil & District Jashpur (C.G.) Insurance Company The Oriental Limited Through Branch Manager, Branch Office Bilaspur, through nearest Branch Office Itwari Bazar, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) Krushmala Minj wd/o Late James Kerketta, aged about 27 years. 5 " Minor - Monika d/o Late James Kerketta, aged about 06 years. 6.^ Minor - Aryan s/o Late James Kerketta, aged about 04 years. through Natural No. 5 and 6 Minor, Guardian & Mother, Krushmala Minj. All by caste Uraon. No. 4 to 6 village Harri, Tahsi] resident of Manora, District Jashpur (C.G.) CIVIL REVISION U/S.-115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE — 3^Er^raT^r, ®TftffTO,fqcii+fy 'WRTT **<!*^.^.........j.l.^, "V^ 20 an^CT ^Rra? (4<:if't«<<ff) SS^V W R(-li<b 'cT^n SIT^FT'^qt^' ^<nwgf?ii sn^f qillfa'AH WSI ^ fs^t ([fl-tjK ^T aiRpT sir^r '^ S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice N. 09.09.2013 & Asarwal Shri AK Prasad, Advocj ite for the applieants. Leamed counsel seeks permission of this court] file an appeal. appeqnng for tfae appKcants, on instmction, to withdraw this revision witfa liberty to Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the revisii bn is dismissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. No ordeii as to costs. Sd/- N.K. Agarwal Judge Sahu 'wtWfWsfWS^'SfW^.y
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: bn is dismissed as withdrawn with the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.