Shri Dwarika Prasad Patel, aged v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Shri Dwarika Prasad Patel, 30 years; Presently posted at Govt. Primary School Kashipali, Block Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). VERSUS
f State of Chhattisgarh, Through: The Secretary, Department School Education, D. K. S. Bhawan, Raipur(C.G-). 2, The District Education Officer, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 3/-^ The Block Education Officer, Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.). WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF APPROPRIATE ETC. MANDAMUS CERTIORARI. AND FOR ORDER/ORDERS. DIRECTION/DIRECTIONS. HMH COURT OF CWWTTISftWH AT BILASPUR SIN6LE NCH : HON'BLE NR. SATISH K. A6NIHOTRI. J. WRTT PETmON (S.Y No.4S8 OF 2007 Petitioncr : Ouryothun Sao versus Reapondents Sturte of Chhcrttisgarh and olhers WMT PETTTION tS.) No.-W9 OF 2007 PetHipner NarWKJh Khunte verais Respondents : State of ChhatMsgurh and o-thers WRTT PETinON (5.1 No.460 OF 2007 Petitioner : Malikram Nog versus Respondents State of Chhorttiagarh ond oltiers WRTT PETTTION (5.1 No-461 OF 2007 Petitwner : Bhola Pwaad Chauhon versus Respondents : State of Chhattisgarh and oKwra WRIT PrrmON (S.l No.462 OF 2007 Petitioner : Amcu'bikB 5no versus Reapondents : SMe of Chhaittisgarh and o'thws And WRTT PETCTION (S.) No.463 OF 2007 Petrtioncr flomesh KunwrPartel versus Redpondents Shrt* of Chhotlisgarh and o'thers Pnsent : Mr. PP. Sdtw, counael for-the prtitwner(s). Akr. Sort-ish fiupta, Deputy 6ovemment Adwcute for Ihe Sftrte/respondents. OR&ER Passed on Ihia 24* Ocy of Jonuary, 2007) --:-. <- ,j Leamed counael appearing for •the parties jointly aubnrit •ttiot the focts and question of law inwlved in Ihc present batch of writ petitions are sqixirely covend by -the decision of this Court in Ihe case of yasfMwit ICamar WMiwlmj w. MwMpal CwpoiwHsn. Owy and
For Ihe aforementioned nasons, Ihese tirit petitions are diaposed of in ternu of •the decision of this Court' in the nwtter of Yashwwit ICumar BheswhMj (Supro), subjeet to verificortion of the fact as to whe-ther -the petittoners ham ccquired B.TX Certificates at -Iheir own expenses ea pcr -the drculars Aited 24-12-1998 and 1-3-1999 and further whether Ihey have been paid •hio advunce increments or not. No order ae to costs.
A copy of 1his order be placed on •thc record of •the connected writ petitwns. __— Sd/- Satish K. Agniliotri Judge 1 2006CtI)MPJR-Cfi96 Tlidur
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.