Judgment · High Court · 2005
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 24 Jun 2005
Provisions considered
Judgment
sn^TqiT f^iwan^r SRI|ffiflf?tT
24.0632008 Shri A.K. Prasad, counsel Shri Devesh Verma, Panel for <he pefitioner. L^wyer for the State/ respondent ^ . No.3. Heard. By this petition, the peUtlonei order dated 22-1-2005 (Annexure-P has allowed the plainUffs application the Code of Civil Procedure for Having considered the facts and material on record, in the has. chatlenged the impugned ]r1) by which learned trial Court filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of amei)dment. tand clrcumstances of the case opifiion of this Court, there ts no iltegality in ttieimpugned order warr^inting interference under Article IBIi IMJN 227 ofttie ConsBtutiohof India. The petitlon falls and is dismi may raise the grounds in appeal in c Consequently, M.(W.).P.No.2i stand disposed^T. Gowri i ssed. The petitioner, however, ^SG such an eventuality arises. &6^05 and I.A.N0.5021W5 also ± Sd/- | Fakhruddin i Judge i '^ ^ ^ ('N;yVr)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Chhattisgarh High Court, on 24 Jun 2005.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.