HIGH COURT OiP CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawii
Provisions considered
Judgment
State of Chhattisgarh, through The Seoretary, Department of Nagri Prashashan and Nikay, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur, Distriot Raipur (CG) The Collector, Raipur, DistriGt Raipur (CG) Council, Tilda Municipal - Chief through Neora, Municipal Officer, Tilda Neora, District Raipur (CG) Pushpa
Operative part
Smt. Mahendra Munioipal Neora, District Raipur (CG) Jain, W/o. President, Tilda Jain, CouncU, WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF (SB: Honlile Mr. Satisb K. Aenihotri._J.l Shri Awadh Tripathi, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vinay Harit, Deputy Advocate General for the State'. ORAL ORDER (Passed oa this 10U1 day of December 2007} Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wanfs to file statuto'iy appeal under Section 41 (4) 6f the C.G. Municipalities Act, 1961, Thus, the petitigner be permitted; to withdraw this petition. • Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection, It is ordered as prayed for, Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawii. " Certified copy ol' the impugned order fiied .along with this petition be returned to the petitioner within three days, •^ 1 Suguna
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawii
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
C.G. Municipalities Act, 1961.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.