INJ'H^HI_6 v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Perraission is granted. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Bmi —- T.P. Sharma Judge
Judgment
State of Chhattisgarh through Station House O-ff'.icer, Police Station-Kharsiya, District Raigarh (CG) Coilector Raigarh (CG) Raigarh, District J'a't'i S&WG Aadim' Sahakar'i Samiti, Kharsiya throUgh the registfered office aT Manager, Thakur Coifege Diyd, Near Kharsiya, Disrrict Rcigarh (CG] PE'rrriON UN&ER SECTTON 482 OF THE CODE ;RIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR T GF THE F.I t^ ftEGISTEREb AT POLICE STATION- YA IN CKI .225/20t2 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDEi 5ECTON 3/70F THE ESSENTlAL COMMODFrEES ACT
SB:- Hon'ble Shri Justice T.P. Sharma Criminal Misc. Petition No.765 of 2013 AppUcant Sanyasi Mehar Versus Respondents 1 State of Chhattisgarh 2 Collector, Raigarh 3 Aadim Jati Sewa Sahakari Samiti Petition Under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure. Appearance: Mr. Awadh Tripathi, coansel for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Singh, Govt. Advocate State/respondents. ORDER (Passed on21.il. 2013) 'the Code'), By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the petitioner has prayed for quashment of FIR registered in Crime No.225/2012 at PoUce Station Khrsiya Distt. Raigarh for the offence punishable under Section 3/7 ofthe Essential Cormnoditieb ir.t. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner 2. seeks pennission to wifhdraw the petition with liberty to raise all fhe grounds available to him under the law, before fhe trial Court at the time of framing charges.
Operative part
Perraission is granted. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Bmi —- T.P. Sharma Judge
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.