Belng aggrieved by the Awgrd passed on v. WaiL^^&ysd-.2^'^!
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Belng aggrieved by the Awgrd passed on 50/89/2005 ta claim case Ho. 2^2005 betweffi fapeadra Pandey V/S Vira Slng & Ors, by the lea»ed 1st Addl. Botor Aecidffit Claias Tribanal, Shri A.K. Safflan'tre»Eurg CGi-fehe aboveDaaed aPPellanVapplicant respectiully contfi... 2 ltM Chhattisgarh Higli Couit©ampus|Bilaspur ^.tt. CaseNo.___2l of £061-1 Appellant/s ££&_£< Si. Versus Respondent/s WaiL^^&ysd-.2^'^! Appetlant wjth /b^ghri Res|3ondent with / by Shri Ads/ocate AdVoGate ^:'..&::..^/,AWiRa.'./;.:...,^^ ^Passed:oni^"^^/^3-^A-;.:'''-:) ^^^^^^ F^ Hjer^by recotd the Gompromi^^^ !j'-.Q/:':,:.^.,' :':!'.^r^:':^,..^;''..^% comprQtnise/ari|dioFder thaf aRpellaitt S^ rocpondotifr/ appellant a sum of Rs._S^Qe^ comj3e nsatjo n-;:lagull4ui'''wil|XiiiLuiusN®-'''';:,'y:f:^^ an nu m :-ff€rm-^£______^__^'3ser^..__^__________..__ ::::",: -,:.: 'trU::.Cui,i^-<h^^.-:'./ -'^'"^:'.^.:' •.;•;. ..,,. Higt aart !^:il m
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.