IJN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT v. Sangi[Bai aliasjj.eelaw«4t
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ss. 140, 173
Judgment
^ Being aggrieved by.the order/interim award dated
16.12.2002, for Rs. 50,000/- under Section 140 of the, Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, passedjji claim case No. 233/ 2002 between the parties (Sangi Bai & others V/s. Uwted India Insurance Co. Ltd. and others) by the^Additional ^^" Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Surajpur (C.G.), appellant begs to prefers this appeal on the following facts and grounds :- FACTS OF THE CASE A,
That on 05.12.2001, nearly 65 to 70 passengers (includ- ing men, women and children) who were residents of village Koshanga, Lakhanpur and Ghanora ofthe Surguja District, were travelling in a heavy goods vehicle bear- S^KQ z> XI-HC—78 '3^r'^!^w^,yol<-iq<o, fsidi-yy NW^I ^^IT^s ^..;...^.:......^.5^.. ^200^ ^IT^ ^?? (^?^a^) ^II^l^T^^ WT^i^fyiw I^TW^rftcT 31?t^T ^P?te^ 'RTR^T ^ fe^ I^T^R i73i^?3??^T
03.11.2004: - Shri Dashrath Gupta, counsel for the appellant. Learned counsel appellant states that in view of the final order has the fact been passed by the Tribunal nothing survives for consjderation in this appeal. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as having become jnfructuous. Sd/- Chief Justice ^ ^ ^ w°
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — ss. 140, 173.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Chhattisgarh High Court, on 03 Nov 2004.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.