Das v. Jaan hospital, Daupara, Mungeli, tehsil and thana Mungeli, post, district Mungeli (CG)
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
PLAINTIFF / Das, aged about 45 years, licensee Shop, Foreign Liquor Retail Daupara, Bilaspur Road, Mungeli, district Mungeli R/o village Mangalpur, thana Mangalpur, ..» tehsil Kendrapda, district Kendrapada (Orissa) Through; Power, of Attorney Holder Krishha Singh S/o Shree vaf^'~ Ramraksha Singh, aged about 50 years R/o Dayalband, thana City Kotwali, Bilaspur, tehsil and post Bilaspur district Bilaspur (CG) VERSUS }^Dr. Ashok Jaan S/o Linkan Jaan, aged about 48 years, Director Dr. Jaan hospital, Daupara, Mungeli, tehsil and thana Mungeli, post, district Mungeli (CG) ?.^ District Excise Officer, D.E.O. 85 office, Mungeli, post thana Mungeli, district Mungeli tehsil DEFENDANT No.2 ^ (C.G.) -/ State of Chhattisgarh
through; Collector/Licensing Authority, Mungeli, post, tehsil & thana Mungeli, district Mungeli DBFENDANT No.3 (C.G.) R^£^^S^ CIVILREVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908 ^ ADR'iScant Nosi-aRoi rilGHCQURTOF ftT ai! A. ij%.H_AT_. H.IL.ASP.yH Civli Revislon No.88 of 2013 Das Vsrsus Dr.Ashok Jaan Dtetrict Excise Officer, D.E.O. Offla State of Chhattlsgarh
3. (Civii Revssion under Sectton 115 of the CPC) Ivir. Mahendra Dubey, counsel for the appiicant. Raspondent No.1 not noticed. Mr.A.M.TitVari, Pansi La'»vyerfor i %;oUUt (SB: Hon'bie Mr. T.P. Shanrsa, J. 1 ^ ORDER (1-8-2013) £> / y Qiij yinifii r^\\ t^^'t f^-ft 4-^»/^ *"ti?iyvS i/t.or^'!'' io i^sVtoiUit i.t i^ cSij^ii^cii IL i tca3» ^/i icaiitesi iy^\J iu^; KSysaiii.y CTUU pj i^-^ai& <^tTi^sSi<^ir%.ii^^»*4 4'^i^i l<"\rf^''sli'»'t/ •'st^?4 y\v'^>f\yl£^\f ^tf T^/'L />r-*^<\8^ <~8'^T»^/*I 4 T lii'cs uiu^sj visai^u Ui ' ^fi^'^t t^'9y-f*ies,f^ f ,r .i<.ui^ |jcai3£?cy vy' l^t.K Ti^^S 1 tiiv *u»rvii ^yuy^s \»»tci-is»a"u, ti i.f/'!^ t^'•SS^*<^_it t'i.fil "7 Mungeil, in Clvii Suit No.34A/2013; whereby the triai Court has dlsmissed an appiication flled by the sppiicant under Order Vii Ruie 11 of the Code of Civii Procedure.
After arguing the matter sometime, iearned counsei for the appiicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this revision with iiberty to raise ait the grounds before the Court at fhe time of framing ths issue and deciding of her applications including fhe appiication for frsming pretiminary issue i.e. Issue in iaw for getting adequate reiief,
3. Permission is granted.
Consequentiy, the revision is djsmissed as withdrswn v/ith ths aforesaid iiberty. interim appiication stands dlsposed of. No order as to cosis. Sdi- T.P.Sharma Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.