APPUCANTS v. NON-APPUCABT
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Vs. NON-APPUCABT State of Cbliattisgarh, thiough Distt. M^istrate Dvig (CG) CR.REV. U/S. 397 READ WITH SBCnON 401 OF tWX CR.P.C. !B -~*-t.
(SB :Hon'ble Mr. T.P.Sharma, J.) F'rcsent: None for the appHcant. Shri Sanjeev Kuniar Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for fhe State. ORDER (Passed on 7th ^»rU20^8) a"~<. When fhe case is caUed out for the second time, none appears for the appUcants. This petition is directed agaiust tbe oxder dated 20.02.2006 passed by the Xth Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) Duig in S.T. No. 212/2005 against the finming of charges. ^^^~I^Si Copy of the chai^es and documents perused. I do not find aay illegalily or iufinnity iu the order impugned. No iaterference is callcd for. Consequentiy, tbe pctition dismissed at the stage of admission. Suguna Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.