Ble High Court · 2009
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 13 Jul 2009
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Shri H.b.Agrawal, Sr. Advoijate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Sniita Qhai, P.L. for t4 At the outset counsel for tl present petition with liberty to fi] No.3 raising all his grievances dated 13.7.2009 (Annexure P/10)! authority be directed to le State. |ie petitioner wants to withdraw the je representatton before respondent ^ainst his impugned transfer order He however submits that the said decitle the representation so made expeditiously. Counsel for the State has the petitioner is decided by the with law. 110 objection if the representation of authority concemed in accordance Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge ^:_.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Chhattisgarh High Court, on 13 Jul 2009.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.