HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Cr.M.P.624of2013 In the matteroF Ramshakal v. State of Chhattisgarh (Office Reference)
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Having regard to the Facts and circumstances shown in the request letter, the prayer made by Additional Sessions Judge, Surajpur, District: - Surguja is allowed and time is extended For next five months From today. Court concemed be informed accordingly also by Fax mode.…
Judgment
Mr. G.D. Waswani, Government Advocate For the State/non-applicant. (SB: Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma.J.) ORDER (Passedon 16.07.2013)
Thisisan of Hce reFerence. I have perused the request letter dated 17.06.2013 received From the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Surajpur, District - Surguja. By the request letfcer dated 17.06.2013, the Additional Sessicns Judge, Surajpur, District - Surguja has requested For extension time FordisposalofSessionsTrial No. 131/2011.
Having regard to the Facts and circumstances shown in the request letter, the prayer made by Additional Sessions Judge, Surajpur, District: - Surguja is allowed and time is extended For next five months From today. Court concemed be informed accordingly also by Fax mode. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge Chandra
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.