Collector, pistrict Raigarh (CG) v. Hanuman prasad Agarwal
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Respondents Plaintiffs Collector, pistrict Raigarh (CG)
2. Assistant Departmerj Chhattisgcj
3. Tresser, Rirector, Town <& Country Planning Raigarh, District Raigarh, [rh. & Town Planning |t, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Country bepartmei^ Chhattisgcjrh.
4. Joint Dir^ Departmei^ Chhattisgcj ^ctor, Town <& Country Planning Raipur, |t, |rh. Chhattisgarh, Vs
Hanuman prasad Agarwal, aged about 55 ^) Lote Shri Gopiram Agrawal, |: Business, R/o Sawadiya Building, |strict Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. |ra Agrawal, aged about 48 years, Ram Kumar Agrawal, Occupation: fo Gandhiganj, Raigarh, District years, S/ Occupatio^ Raigarh, D| 2. Dr. Rajenc| S/o Shri Doctor, Rj Raigarh, Cljihattisgarh.
Ashok Kun(ar Mehata, aged about 55 years, Shri P.L. Mehata, Occupation: it Station Chowk, Raigarh, R/o Raigarh, S/o Latel Business Oagorapar^i, Raigarh, Chhattisg4'h. bistrict
19.3.2009 Mr. Shashank Thakur, Panel Ljawyer for the State. Heard. ; ,^^ ^y^. T XI-HC—78 -g-s^- ^(^id^, ^iTli<4<l<o, fsRTTHy *II*I^T^^I^ ^ 200 W^T "q^^ (^3^?) ^T^^T'^IW ^sff a^^T iRte ¥^HW^%a 311^? ^_"7^-1 ^T^NN "WT^f ^f 'fe^ <Ps<^i< ^3tRw3??T^y The petitioner by the ins|-c ins|-ant petition has prayed for quashing of the order dated 11.12.( learned Civil Judge, Class-I, Raigaj' .p007 (Annexure P-1) passed by 'h whereby meeting in relation to Development Scheme, Raigarj h scheduled for 13th <& 14th becember, 2004 has been stay^d stayejd by an order of temporary injunction. Learned counsel for the pe') ^itioner submits that he is not pressing this petition on merits, hcjwever, he prays for a direction to the concerned court below t^ consider pending application preferred by the petitioner undet Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC for dismissing the civil suit itself withi^ the specified period. In view of above submissi<in learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petiti^n is dismissed as not pressed. However, the trial court concernje icernjed is directed to decide the pending application of the petition| irs filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC within a period of foi|r |r weeks' from the date of receipt/production of certified c4 ^py of this order, in case the same is not decided till date. Consequently, I.A. No.l also ^tands disposed of. _, _ Certified copy as per rules. D»^wishra Judge IIPI^»N»' -4... 9L
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.