Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR .^r RIa- Rfflg*,?' Sg|8i? BSSW M.A&') /2007 ^Ajppellant fts^ '^y^^' ^ -,tu-a'i e '•.S^'^/ ^r^, B^spondent Rajesh Kumar Uraw Aged 18 years S/o. Ankar Lal Uraw Through : Ankar Lal Aged 45 years S/o. Manaw Ram Village & Post: Botalda Police Station : Kharsiya District: Raigarh (C.G.) Versus M/s. Mussadilal Mansaram, Rice Mill, Through : Manager Babu Lal Aged 54 years S/o. Ganpat Rai Agrawal, Thurkela, Post: Kharsiya District: Raigarh (C.G.) Miscellaneous Appeal Under Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 XI-HC-22 s^ •^i<<icfi), ®Tnyi6,Ridi+iy . *ll*lMl shll<*> Sfl^i q^^l h.A. C^^^0-z(' V^' 200^_ f§re% 3ii^r?iT R-fi-tisn^r siiiebyfsn 311^1 ^WIWH<?(T 12-2007 »tii<<Ffl41-it]ii<iTfffel<'1 <Kiw.\i. ^art^irsn^r No one appsars for the apj^ This matter was 'isted todd e'lant when this matter was called. iv for orders on M.(C.'iP.No.283/2007 fbr condonation of deiay in filing tt|is appeai. Sincs no one appears for fl made on his beha'f, this Misce'lanl he appeltsnt and no representation !s |eous Appeal is ciismissed 'n defauit of the appeilant. In vtew of above, M.(C.)P.I to.283/2007 for condo ration of deiav s'so stands dismisssd. Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge T'jmsns
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.