DEVISION BENCH v. Smt.De^
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
DEVISION BENCH: HON'BLE MR. DHiRENDRAMI^ HON'BLEMR. DIL3P RAOSAHEb DESHSViUKS-LJJ HRA& FAJ m No.86/2008 (Memo of Appea! under Sectiojn 19 (1) of the FamilyCourts Act, 1984) APPELLANTS/ APPLICANTS Vs RESPONDENTS NON-APPLICANT Smt. De^ 26 year^, Station Chhattis^ ^pika Sidar, W/o Jairam Sidar, aged about resident of Viiiage Sawani, Police <otra Road, Tehsii & District Raigarh, larh. Jairas|n Sidar, S/o Goverdhan Sidar, aged about 33 y^ars, Occupatlon: Shiksha Karmi Grade Sli, R/o yiliage GudeJi, Po!ice Station and Tehsll Sarar|garh, DIstrict Raigarh Chhatisgarh. Presejit: Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Ad' Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Advocate for the ocate for the appeilants. 'espondent.
23.10.2008 Learned counsel s appeiiants submits that he has no instructions from .the appeEEants: In view of the above subrtilssipn Issipn, the Instant appeai is dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty t4 revive. Sd/- Dhirendra Mishra Judge Sd/- Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh Judge -^ ^
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.