CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR M.C.C No. 181 of 2007 · Chhattisgarh High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Haji Kalim Raza S/o Late Shri Zahural Hassan, aged about 47 years, Treasurer, Management Conamittee, Jama Masjid, Raipur (C.G.)
Haji Ziaur Rehman S/o Late Syed Abdul Rchnian, aged about 44 years R'o Naya Para, Raipur (C.G.)
Syed Hasan Ali S/o Late Syed Asliraf Ali, aged about 50 years, R/o Rahmania Chowk, Raipur.
Haji Abdul Razzak Khan S/o Shri Mishri Khaa @ Bhukku Bhaiya, aged about 45 years, R/o Moudahapara- Raipur (C.G.)
Haji Kazi Maqsood S/o Late Mohd. Maood, aged aboirt 42 years R/o Baijnathpara, Raipur (C.G.).
Haji Mohammad Anis Shri Wali Mohannnad, aged about 36 years, Churi Line, Raipw (C.G.)
Haji Mohainmad Kliaii S/o Late Haji Rahim Khan aged about 37 vears R/o Telibandha, Raipur (C.G.) VER8US S/o RESPONDENTS : 1) State acting of Chhattisgarh tfarough Secretary, Revenue Departinent, D.K.S. Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 2) The Collector, Raipur. 3) The Nazul Officer, Raipur. 4) The Talisiidar, Nazul, Raipur (C.G.)S;-- 5) M/s. Raipw Transport Company Pvt. Ltd., a compaay incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act 1956, Head Qffice Raipur, Traiisport, Compaay Buildiag, G.E. Road, Raipur, through - Partner. Single Bench : Hon'ble Justice Shri Satish K. AgnBwtri. Present: Shri M.K.Sinha, Advocate for the applicaiits. Shri Satisli Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate for flie State. (Passed on 12fh day of June,
Leamed counsel for the petitioners submits that fhe coimsel for the petitionere could not appear on account ofbonafide mistake, Iherefore, W.P. No. 2625 of 2005, which was dismissed
15.02.2007, be restored to its file.
2. Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. W.P No. 2625 of 2005 be restored to the original file, subject to payment of cost of Rs. 250/- by 1he applicants, to the Hi^i Court Legal Aid Committee.
3. A copy of this order be placed on record of Writ petition No. 2625 of 2005 and the same be listed for hearing. Sd/- Satish K. Agnihotri Judge Aimt
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.