Judgment · High Court

S/o Shri Vishun Ram Paikara, aged about 22 years, R/o Keshala, Post Sitapur, District-Sarguja (C.G.) J RESPONDENTS:

State of Chhattisgarh VERSUS -^^ ^ ^ through Secretary Panchayat Department D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur C.G.

Zila Panchayat Sarguja, through Chief Executive Officer, Sarguja, District Sarguja (C.G.)

Janpad Panchayat, Sitapur, Through Chief Executive officer, Janpad Panchyat Sitapur, District Sarguja (C.G.)

Chief Executive officer, Janpad Panchyat, Sitapur, District Sarguja (C.G.)

Government Primary School, Noniyatangar, Janpad Panchayat, Sitapur, District Sarguja, (C.G.) WMT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2 OF CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEALTO DIVISION BENCHl ACT 2007. HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CORAM: HON. SHRI YATINDRA SINGH, C.J. & HON'BLE SHRI PRITINKER DIWAKER, J W. A. No. 267 of 2013 APPELLANT Sant Kumar Paikara ' RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh Present: Shri R. K. Jain, counsel for the appellant. Shri Pravin Das, Dy. G-A. for respondents 1 & 5. ORDE R (10.06.2013) This is a writ appeal against order dated 01.03.2013 dismissing the writ petition of Shri Sant kumarPaikra (appellant). Heard counsel for the parties. Learned single Judge has recorded finding that there was no appointment letter and the appellant was working on the basis of forged appointment letter and therefore he is not entitled for the same. Thus, there is no illegality jn the order impugned. The writ petition has no merit and it js accordingly dismissed. Sd/- ChiefJustice Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge