Limited v. Durg(CG)
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
!JM THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR ^^^No.^hT^ v^ r~ £y/iz. PETITIONER— Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, ^-^^t—Through Officer-in-charge of -) l^%.^'^'l^-y' .••-'—~~—'"3->1%.l+"*" case and Assistant Engineer, Civir Transmission Division, Bhilai 3, Dist. ^.^f>""'{,\s\9^""^..y'lt""~ y^...-- ^!.-- ^60-" VERSUS " ' Durg(CG) ^ RESPONDENT— Municipal Corporation Through The Commissioner, Bhilai Municipal Corporation Dist. Durg (CG) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226^PF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OJ: WRITOF MANDAMUS. AND ANY OTHER WRIT. ORDER QR DIRECTION AS DEEIVIEDFIT. -I^J^U-"nJ^'ua-c'^—"'"titrl.-F'>r(''*lGi"iic>:-_ ._. ^pXl^iC—78 •-S3E.S: ^> s^r^rprfpRT. t?riTffiT's. Isf^iyy TWW "ffW^i " co &s-^<^ ,V\ 20 3»lCT Wfg; i yi^o-iy) 31I^(?ilfeiq? wiisn^T'a^Tai TWWflfet "timi ^ipriwit1! wS tf fsv\ TSsKzn •^3JfOT31K?I DIWAKER= J^ o^^ i^i^r^f^m^ ir^T^i I^TI le^i i?^ Sd/- pritmkerDiwaker Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.