FUR v. RESPONDENT8

State of Chhftttisgarh, Ttarough Secretary, Law and Legislatiwe AfiEancs Department, Uantealaya, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur(C.G.)t The Depuly Srifctetaiy, Law aud Legialatnre AfGaira Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, KflgnM-jC.G.) The Diatrict & SesMoas Judge, Baster, J^dalpur. paaraTon UBDBR ARMCIA aac/aar <» THB WSIT coiiBnTcnon w XSOIA fast lasoASCK OB' A SBITAaUB WRIT. ORDBR OR DIRBCTlOB TO DO JXTBTICB CT THB MAnraiR. 3~^ •Ol^iy'M,; t?Tll*t-i|'S,i'fa(;ll«^<;^ ...^..........^^^M^.j sn^i^TOS? (^^?^*t) ^ si^V ft-ti* wiS? gwiwBftaai^i ^tptJ<?)<lll 4fsMf ^ TS£^<Fal^$R^ ^f SlfilB 3t il ^ ^~:V

27.3.,2005 On li mention being miKie. p+secas^jstakenypfoi'.hairing. Shrilndra Sen Saiiu, Cour|sel for the petitioner Shr-i Pramod Kymar Vernla, Addi-tional Advocate 6eneral- for the STate/respondents. l-1eard both the counsel. The petitionet' has prefer^ed 1+iiswrit petition under Artide 226/ 227 of the Constitution ef Ind |a, questianing the iegaiit^ pr-opriety and eorrectness of tto or'dep ?lei*ect

31.0®.2003(AnnexyreP-14) passed by resDondent No.3. •; Brief facts leading to filir^g <?f •Hiis petition we "rtintthe pe.titioner is practicing as Nofei-y in &is*r'i<it: Jagc^lpur' (Bda&ir). As her.fenure of the cer'tificate to practice d^ notary wois expiring(1+ierefope, petitioner meiy^ :on opi^coM^]R^befoT'& -fhe responcient/State for Bnd vide order aated 31.12.Z003 her renewai of the said certificdN certificate was renswed for a j^eriod of -riirse and proyiSionS'af Sub-Section years os psr 1+is old kiw [2) of $ection 5 of -the Notaries Act,

1952. Whereas, ftie said prov) ision STOOG amended lav the Aet 36 of 1999, wher^faY the pei'iod of ^hpee year's was amendecl to five years WA.f. 17.12.1999. , I have perused sub-Secti^in (2) OT Section 5 of the Notaries Act, IBRPRJ—FS/350—12/2000—50WO. ISS'Swhich.rendstbyS"."... ±' XI-HC—78 '3^ •<ii^i(*i-4,;yxil*)*!is,'fi(CTi'yi< ^' '^^•^•"•^ *<i*ini^»tflcf> a;ii^f^'CRER( l^i^'i8'^ sn^i ^i R-ii+' '?f2H ^IT^T ^+itqi 'lhe giovernment app< : ' 7^i^i<^*f1l ^Wdl' ^f fe<d1 <Hi!li^.K -: ^? sifgK sn^. '-—^ inting tiie notary,_may, on cend the preschibed fee, if practice pf any notary for a time. " / receipt of an qspiica^on renew the eertjficate it a period of five years c|t ^, TTierefore, in yiew of above provisions the petiticiner's certificate to practice as Notary ought to have been renewed for a period of five years. In the 'circumstances. |?eTifibners petition deserveS to; be aflowed. Accordingly, -rhe petition js ailowed and ttae re^jondents are directed ta renew theipetitionsr's certificate for procticing as Notary for a period pf fi'/e years instedd ^>f three yedrs wi-tfi effect from the origina! date from which she wasen' h'Tled TQt' renewai of thscartificdTe. In yiew of •Hiis order, M.(W-5P-No.3280/2Q03 I.A. No.10415/2003 stand disposed of. Part'ies aFeentitled for certiljjed copy of this op Soma -^, l!"i '- if1': LC.Bhados ^ Jiidge c—s(