PBTITIONBR v. Raoieshwar Prasad, Gupta
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
this petition is dismissed as withdrawn wifh
Provisions considered
- Excise Act, 1915 s. 47A(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. under Section 47A (2) off he Excise Act, 1915. Prayer is aUowed, Consequenffy, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn wifh aforesaid Uberty. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^^
Judgment
(8B :Hon*ble Mr. T.P.SIiarma, J.) Present:. Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate for the petitioner. Shii Rajendra Tripathi, P.L. for the State/respondent. ORAL- ORDBR (Passedon 20/8/2009)
Heaid. During the coiirse of argument leamed coiinsel for the petitioner submits fhat he has not fUed any appUcation under Section 47A (2) of the Excise Act, 1915 (as amendment by the State of C.G.) for iaterim custody of fhe vehicle before fhe conipetent aufhority Collector fherefore, he seeks to wifhdraw fhis petitibn with Uberty to file appropriate appUcation before fhe appropriate autiiority
Operative part
under Section 47A (2) off he Excise Act, 1915. Prayer is aUowed, Consequenffy, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn wifh aforesaid Uberty. Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ^^
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: this petition is dismissed as withdrawn wifh
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Excise Act, 1915 — s. 47A(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.