Roman Ram v. State ofChhattisgarh & Ors.
Judgment
Roman Ram, S/o- Shri Ronha Ram, Aged about 27 years, Preseiitly Workiag as Waterman in- Ashram School, Rangpur, Govind Ram, S/o- Shri Mheshwar Ram, Aged about 30 years, Presently Working as Cook in- Ashram School, Pakr&l Bathan, L3-. Maheshwar Singh, S/o- Shri Purau Ram, Aged about 40 years, Presently Working as Waterman in- Ashram School, Sendwar, Dubraj Sai Paikra, S/o- Shri Girdhari Sai, Aged about 28 years, Presently Working as Waterman in- Ashram School, Pattakela,
15.., Sudesh Ram, S/o- Shri Genda Ram, Aged about 26 years, Presently Working^^Chowkidar in- Ashram School, Pakral Bathan, Ravindra Ram, S/o- Shri Boyaa Ram, Aged about 27 years, Presently Working as Cook in- Ashram School, Pattakela, Bhukan Ram, S/o- Shri Dhundhru Ram, Aged about 27 years, Presently Working as Waterman in- Ashram School, Kadamtoli, Basant Lal Yadev, S/o- Shri Kadam Sai, Aged about 29 years,, Presently Working as Waterman in- Ashram School, Sardha Path, Bhuneshwar Ram Yadev, S/'o- Shri Jodhan Yadev; Aged about 28 years, Presently Workiag as Sweeper in- High School, Rouni, Indarnath Ram, S/o- Shri Paras Ram, Aged about 32 years, Presently Working as Sweeper in- High School, Bimda, Hemant Kumar Yadev, S/'o- Shri Thunu Ram, Aged about 37 yeafs, Presently Working as Chowkidar ia- Ashram School. Sardha Path, 's.ii^?9;: s) Bhakti Ram, S/o- Shri Dewadhi Yadev, Aged about 40 years, Presently Working as Sweeper in- High Scho'ol, Pandrafath,
#23. Vinod Ram Yadev, S/o- Shri Dhunu Ram, Aged about 37 years, Presently Working as Sweeper in- High School, Tat Kela,
#24. o Amblu Ram, S/o- Shri Gharnu Ram, Aged about 40 years, Presently Working as Waterman in- Ashram School, Kama Rima, Rameshwar Ram, S/o- Shri Sani Ram, Aged about 35 years, Presently Working as Chowkidar in- Ashram School, Kam^ Rima, ^S^ Sangeeta Bai, W/o- Shri MXJ^- Aged about 26 years, Presently Working as Cook in- Ashram School, Rangpur, ^ Jageshwar Ram, S/o- Shri Sahdeo Ram, Aged about 26 years, Presently Working as Waterman in- Ashram School, Sardha Path, Ku. Pushpa Toppo, W/o- Shri Avadone, Aged about 25 years, Presently Working-as'Cook in- Ashram School, Madhupur, Banwasi Lal, S/o- Shri ^,^^ ) &»-^~ Aged about 38 years, Presently Working as Chowkidar in- Ashram School, Madhupur,' Chandu Ram, S/o- Shri Tuyu Ram, Aged about 26 years, Presently Working as Waterman in- Ashram School, Madhupur, 31
#32. Virendra Kumar Bhagat, S/o- Shri Dharmu Ram, Aged about 28 yeais," Presently Working as Waterman in- Ashram School, Laranga, Narayan Ram Yadev, S/o- Shri Dhuryodhan Yadev, Aged about 40 years, Presently Working as Chowkidar in- 'Ashram School, Baladar Path, - :"\ Ram, S/o- Shri Shobha Ram, 26 years, Presently Working as Waterman in-
#34. Ku. Sushila Yadev, D/o- Shri Dettu Ram, Aged about 25years, Presently Working as Waterman in- Ashram School, Sarab Kombo, Nabi Ram, S./o- Shritto4u->a^"- , Aged about 39 years, Presently Working as»Chowkidar in- Ashram School, Dev Dand, All are, Block-Bagicha, DistT.-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. State of Chhattisgarh, Through-Secretary, Department of Schedule Tribe & Schedule- -Caste & Tribal Welfare Development, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
#1. Collector, Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. Assistant Commissioner , Adivasi Vikas —Jashpur, Distt.-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. PETITIONERS As mentioned above. As mentioned above. The instant petition is not being filed herewith a^ but for issuance of appropriate directioo to fhe respoadents to consider the V6 II J-— _.L s-'ei^^^'BW.fF;"; HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BIL^^PUR WRff PETmON (S) No. 1563 of2012 PETmONER Safikar Prasad Yadav & Others. RESPONDENTS VERSUS State ofChhattisgarh & Others. WRIT PETmON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTlON OF WDIA SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri, J. Present: Shri Pankaj Shrivastava, Advoeate for the petitioners. Sbn Y.S.Thaiair, Deputy Advocatc General for the State/ respondents. ORDER (Passed on 11th day of April, 2012)
#4. Anut seeking a direction to consider The petitioners applications for selection on the post of Peon (Regular), pursuant to the advertisement dated 12.03.2012 (Aimexure P/4). According to Shri Shrivastava, fhe petitioners have all the requisite . qualification and experience as required for consideration for selection to the post of peon. However, since their applications the authorities may be direeted to were rejected in the past, consider fhe applications and allow them to participate in the selection process. The prayer is misconceived. If the applications ofthe petitioners have been rejected in the past, may be on one or the other eround, that cannot be a @round to approach this Court before Iheir present applications are considered by the authorities for selection on the post ofPeon. The petition is misconceived and premature. Resultantly, the petition is (Msmissed at the admission stage itself, being bereft ofmerit as no cause ofaction has arisen till date. f~~~~~" • Sd/- SatishK. Agnihotri Judge
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.